|
In
a filing in Manhattan federal court, the largest U.S. bank said
Epstein's accusers had too many differences to sue under an
"oversimplified" theory that it was liable to all of them by
having provided Epstein with banking services.
JPMorgan said allowing a class action "skips over" how Epstein's
conduct "varied from victim to victim, and across time," and
that the bank's knowledge at the time and provision of banking
services similarly varied.
The question "is not whether Epstein's behavior was monstrous.
It was," JPMorgan said. "The question before the court is
whether to certify a class in this lawsuit. It should not."
Lawyers for the accusers did not immediately respond to requests
for comment.
Class actions let plaintiffs sue as a group, potentially
allowing greater recoveries at lower costs than if they were
forced to sue individually.
Epstein was a JPMorgan client from 1998 to 2013.
He was also a Deutsche Bank AG client from 2013 to 2018, which
faces a separate proposed class action by Epstein's accusers.
In both lawsuits, the accusers have called the banks "Epstein's
secret weapon" that made his years of sexual abuse and
trafficking possible.
Both cases are scheduled for trial later this year. The banks
have denied wrongdoing.
Epstein died in August 2019 in a Manhattan jail cell while
awaiting trial for sex trafficking, in what New York City's
medical examiner called a suicide.
The cases in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New
York, are Jane Doe 1 v Deutsche Bank AG et al, No. 22-10018, and
Jane Doe 1 v JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, No. 22-10019.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Shri
Navaratnam)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2022 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|
