Tesla’s new car-making process stokes debate among industry experts
Send a link to a friend
[May 15, 2023] By
Norihiko Shirouzu, Paul Lienert and Victoria Waldersee
(Reuters) - Tesla Inc's new vehicle-assembly system, which created
instant buzz when it was unveiled in March, ignited a debate among auto
manufacturing experts on whether CEO Elon Musk's so-called unboxed
process is radical, revisionist or derivative - or all of the above.
Musk believes the company needs to radically rethink conventional
manufacturing methods in order to build more affordable - and profitable
- electric vehicles in higher volumes.
Investors have been waiting for Tesla, the world's most valuable
automaker, to announce what is perceived as the company's holy grail: An
electric vehicle priced under $30,000. Right now, the least expensive
Tesla starts at more than $40,000.
The unboxed assembly process is intended to enable Tesla to hit that
ambitious price target.
One expert described the process as "revolutionary," with the potential
to upend the auto industry's traditional moving assembly line. Others
questioned whether a process that relies on previously tested techniques
such as modular assembly can contribute to dramatically lower production
costs.
When the new process was revealed at Tesla's March 1 Investor Day,
executives said it would make the company's next-generation vehicles
"significantly simpler and more affordable."
Officials said the unboxed process could cut production costs in half
and reduce the factory footprint by 40%. The aim, said the company, is
to "build more vehicles at lower cost."
The assemblage of new techniques will not be fully tested until the
system is installed in late 2024 at Tesla's new $5 billion plant in
Monterrey, Mexico, where the company plans to build a new generation of
sub-$30,000 EVs.
Several big questions loom: What sort of impact will Tesla's process
have on the auto industry overall? Will it render useless the widely
copied Toyota Production System? And can Musk actually make his
company's process work as promised given Tesla's history of missed
production deadlines and failed attempts to deploy unproven technology?
Tesla did not immediately reply to requests for comment for this story.
Martin French, managing director at consulting firm Berylls which
focuses on the industry's rapid shift to electric and smart mobility,
wondered if Tesla's move might supplant decades-old lean manufacturing
methods pioneered by industry kingpin Toyota Motor Corp.
"I got the feeling when I watched the Tesla (presentation) that the
Toyota Production System handbook has just been thrown up in the air and
machine-gunned down," French said.
German researcher Jan-Philipp Büchler of the Free University of
Dortmund, believes Tesla's new process is "revolutionary," adding: “This
is much more than modular production ... It's eliminating steps that
were standard, creating new patterns of working, increasing speed,
reducing complexity.”
Tesla is still testing various elements of the system, including the use
of large front and rear subassemblies built on single-piece underbody
castings, which are then joined to a central structural battery pack.
Body panels are painted separately, then joined together toward the end
of the assembly process.
[to top of second column] |
A view of the Tesla service centre in
Singapore July 16, 2022. REUTERS/Chen Lin/
OUT WITH THE OLD?
Some manufacturing experts believe the unboxed process has the
potential to reduce or eliminate familiar elements inside auto
factories, including stamping, welding and painting unfinished car
bodies and sending them down a long assembly line where seats,
engines and other components are attached.
If everything works as planned, the unboxed process could rewrite
the industry's standard playbook and practices. But Tesla has often
fallen short of its ambitious targets, from the oft-delayed
Cybertruck to its still-unfinished "Full Self Driving" software.
Lean gurus like James Womack and Hide Oba see key differences
between the Toyota production way and Tesla's proposed overhaul.
At its core, the Tesla method "is an assembly process" while Toyota
has developed a far broader and more comprehensive "production
management system" that helps automakers run assembly processes and
related operations more efficiently, said Womack, a professor at the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology and co-author of "The Machine
That Changed the World," the 1990 book on Toyota's lean production
philosophy and methods.
A big risk cited by Oba, an independent lean-manufacturing
consultant, is what he describes as the “rigidity” of the unboxed
system. Oba worked previously for the Toyota Production System
Support Center, a division that helps the automaker's suppliers and
others implement TPS.
The Tesla process "won’t work unless production of these big,
high-content unboxed vehicle modules are completely synchronized,
and finished blocks arrive for a final put-together just-in-time,”
he said.
Another question is whether Tesla can produce multiple vehicle
models of different sizes and body styles on the same production
line with the unboxed system.
“My guess is that’s next to impossible,” Oba said. That is because
the way Tesla has sliced or "unboxed" the vehicle into several big
blocks is so radical, and the dimensions of those blocks do not
appear to offer much room for manufacturing variables.
“That could become a drag on the company’s overall efficiency since
Tesla’s model lineup is sure to become more varied and complex” in
the future, he said.
(Reporting by Norihiko Shirouzu in Austin, Texas, Paul Lienert in
Detroit and Victoria Waldersee in Berlin; Additional reporting by
Joseph White in Detroit; Editing by Ben Klayman and Matthew Lewis)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|