| 
		Making the four-day week work for Britain
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [May 16, 2023]  By 
		Sarah Young and David Milliken 
 HOVE, England (Reuters) - Two workers glide between a computer screen 
		and a stainless steel vat making face cream, a scientist in a white coat 
		mixes a formula and a colleague sticks labels on bottles.
 
 Apart from the whir of machines, there is silence: this is "deep work 
		time" at British skincare maker Five Squirrels when staff strive to 
		boost productivity so they can take Fridays off and still get a full 
		week's pay.
 
 Owner Gary Conroy said his 15 workers had smashed through their targets 
		since switching to the shorter week last June and introducing four-hour 
		periods each day when they ignore emails, don't answer phone calls and 
		turn off instant messaging.
 
 What may seem an eccentric experiment is one of a number of trials of 
		four-day working that has drawn interest from economists and businesses 
		keen to find a solution to a slowdown in productivity growth in Britain 
		and other Western economies.
 
 Productivity - or economic output per hour worked - grew at an average 
		of just over 2% a year in Britain from the 1970s until the run-up to the 
		financial crisis, underpinning a steady rise in living standards.
 
 But between 2010 and 2019, it averaged just 0.75% and the Bank of 
		England forecasts it will remain weak over the next few years, partly 
		due to more red tape since Brexit.
 
		
		 
		In that context, cramming the same output into a four-day week 
		represents the equivalent of a decade's worth of productivity gains 
		before the mid 2000s slowdown - and in the case of Five Squirrels, 
		there's a happier workforce too.
 "Everyone was pounding through their work from Monday to Thursday to 
		make sure that Friday, it was definitely going to happen," said 
		production executive Lilly Ellis, 21. "It was really easy to keep that 
		energy up as well. It's not really dropped off."
 
 INVESTMENT HELPS
 
 The company based in Hove on Britain's south coast was one of 61 firms - 
		most with 25 or fewer employees - to take part in the world's biggest 
		four-day week trial last year. Pleased with the outcome, 56 have stuck 
		with the policy.
 
 The vast majority said overall productivity and performance were 
		maintained, though for some firms the need to work longer hours on the 
		four working days meant they failed to cut a full eight hours from the 
		week.
 
 The organizations behind the trial, the 4 Day Week Campaign and research 
		group Autonomy, told Reuters they would be running a new trial from June 
		12 and had received hundreds of enquiries.
 
 Part of Britain's long-term productivity problem stems from low 
		investment, which was the weakest in the Group of Seven rich nations in 
		2021, according to World Bank data.
 
 The experience of some companies in the first trial suggests that moving 
		to a four-day week might help, if it prompts firms to spend more on 
		equipment and training.
 
 Stellar Asset Management's chief operating officer Daryl Hine said the 
		financial services firm introduced new technology to streamline and 
		automate processes when it moved to four days.
 
		
		 
		While that might have led to fears about job losses in the past, Hine 
		said "everybody could see the tangible benefits". The productivity gains 
		at Five Squirrels were also helped by investment. Conroy bought new 
		machinery to make smaller batches of sunscreen, anti-wrinkle washes and 
		skin-firming serum in a less labor-intensive way, and a new labeling 
		machine.  
		The company created a weekly schedule too, clustering tasks instead of 
		switching between them, that led to a bottle labeling rate of 120 per 
		hour, up from 25 previously. 
 BIG COMPANIES
 
 Jan-Emmanuel De Neve, economics professor at the University of Oxford, 
		said 10% productivity gains may be a more realistic aim for most than 
		the 20% boost that would come from shifting to four days and maintaining 
		output.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            Lilly Ellis, Production Executive works 
			on skincare products at 5 Squirrels, a skincare company, in Hove, 
			Britain April 18, 2023. REUTERS/Anna Gordon 
            
			 
            But even so, he believes there is a moral case to try a shorter week 
			when many workers report poor mental health. "It's been almost 100 
			years since we moved to the five-day week ... so it's high time that 
			we start thinking more cogently about next steps," he said, 
			referring to U.S. carmaker Henry Ford and his introduction of a 
			five-day week in 1926. 
 While large companies have been more skeptical about the idea, the 
			trials and the COVID pandemic, when millions of people suddenly 
			switched to home-working, have forced employers to be more 
			open-minded about different work practices. "There's a status quo 
			bias. Employers are very reticent to try something new," said 
			Jonathan Boys, senior economist at Britain's Chartered Institute of 
			Personnel and Development, adding that some workers may want longer 
			hours and more money. Other countries are trialing options. Spain is 
			spending 10 million euros to subsidize small manufacturers so they 
			can cut working hours by at least 10% while maintaining pay in an 
			upcoming two-year trial. Among big companies looking at different 
			options is Unilever, the global consumer goods giant which makes 
			Knorr stock cubes and Dove soap and employs 127,000 people. It 
			piloted a four-day week for its 80 New Zealand staff over 18 months, 
			and has since extended it to 500 workers in Australia, a move it 
			hopes will attract new talent. Nick Bangs, head of Unilever in 
			Australia and New Zealand, said ruthless prioritization and the 
			scrapping of unnecessary meetings helped drive sales in New Zealand 
			while employees were less stressed and more energized. Absenteeism 
			dropped 34%.
 
 HIRING ADVANTAGE
 
 Britain is suffering from an acute shortage of workers and larger 
			companies have typically had an advantage when it comes to hiring, 
			but some experts say moving to a four-day week could turn the 
			tables.
 
 Nick South, a senior partner at Boston Consulting Group, said 
			smaller firms with more of a shared ethos might find it easier to 
			switch to a new dynamic and that could give them an edge when it 
			comes to hiring talent.
 
            
			 
			Unlike every other major economy, Britain's workforce in early 2023 
			was still slightly smaller than before the pandemic and vacancies 
			were a third higher, reflecting an increase in early retirement and 
			long-term sickness, as well as more full-time students.
 "Bigger companies will probably find it harder to do at scale. So 
			actually it gives small- and medium-sized companies something 
			potentially really quite attractive in their proposition," said 
			South, who advises on hybrid working.
 
 Stellar Asset Management's Hine said the four-day offer made a 
			massive difference when it wanted to add to its 30 staff. Conroy at 
			Five Squirrels agreed, saying it had helped to lure scientists from 
			established multinationals. "It's just much easier to get people 
			that might have been hesitant over the line," he said.
 
 British recruitment agency Reed.co.uk said it had seen a rise in the 
			number of job advertisements offering a four-day week since the 
			start of the year.
 
 But four-day weeks did not work for all.
 
 Allcap, a supplier of industrial components with 36 employees in 
			western England, tried a four-day week after its staff had worked 
			flat out during the pandemic to supply protective equipment and 
			ventilator parts. But it struggled to respond to clients at all 
			times and allow staff to also take annual leave and sick days, 
			meaning workers in the warehouse could not cope. "It was creating as 
			much pressure coming in as we were trying to release by giving time 
			off in the first place," managing director Mark Roderick said.
 
 (Reporting by Sarah Young and David Milliken; Editing by David 
			Clarke)
 
			[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.]This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
 
			
			
			 |