Victims of ‘deepfake porn’ and ‘doxing’ could have right to sue under
pair of bills
Send a link to a friend
[May 16, 2023]
By NIKA SCHOONOVER
& ANDREW ADAMS
nschoonover@capitolnewsillinois.com
aadams@capitolnewsillinois.com
SPRINGFIELD – Victims of “deepfake porn” and “doxing” would have a legal
pathway to sue their perpetrators in Illinois under a pair of digital
privacy measures that have so far received unanimous support in the
General Assembly.
House Bill 2954, which would allow victims of “doxing” to pursue civil
litigation, needs only a signature from the governor to become law after
clearing both chambers of the General Assembly unanimously.
Doxing, as defined by HB 2954, occurs when an individual intentionally
publishes another person’s personal information without their consent.
For an offense to qualify as doxing, the person publishing the
information must have acted with intent to “harm or harass” the victim
with “knowledge or reckless disregard” that it could lead to “death,
bodily injury, or stalking.”
Additionally, the published information must have caused the victim harm
in some way, including economic injury or emotional distress. A person
found by a court to have suffered from doxing would be eligible to
recover damages and other relief such as attorney's fees.
“It is absolutely critical for our laws to evolve with the changing
nature of the cyber world,” bill sponsor Sen. Julie Morrison, D-Lake
Forest, said in a news release. “This legislation provides a necessary
solution to the dangerous practice of doxing, by both helping victims
and deterring future bad actors.”
The bill creates some exemptions for those publishing others’ private
information, including if the information was shared to report criminal
activity or if it was shared to the news media and was constitutionally
protected.
The measure would also allow a court to grant temporary restraining
orders and injunctions ordering the defendant to cease publication of
the identifying information while the case is pending.
The ACLU of Illinois opposed the bill, saying they’re concerned about
the overbroad definitions of “publish” and “personally identifiable
information.”
The measure defines “publish” as making information available to another
person.
“Personally identifiable information” is defined as any identifying
information combined with other information such as the person’s social
security number, social media accounts, education and employment
information, information about gender identity or sexual orientation, or
information about how to enter a person’s teleconference meeting.
Angela Inzano, policy and advocacy strategist for ACLU Illinois, said
the organization is concerned the definitions would allow individuals to
file suit even if the information is shared privately or already
publicly available.
“They did narrow the definition of ‘publish’ to make it clear that it
did not apply to two people texting back and forth,” Inzano said in an
interview. “That was useful, but we feel like it’s still not far
enough.”
‘Deepfake porn’
House Bill 2123, a measure allowing victims of so-called “deepfake porn”
– or digitally altered, nonconsensual sexual images – to sue the creator
of those images passed the Senate unanimously last week and awaits
action in the House.
The bill would give victims of deepfake porn the same legal footing as
victims who have had their actual sexual images shared without their
consent. It does so by amending a 2019 law which created a pathway to
civil action for people who have suffered harm from the unwanted
distribution of their sexual images. These images are sometimes called
“revenge porn,” so-called to describe a situation in which someone who
obtained sexual images consensually later shares them to harm the
subject.
[to top of second column]
|
Sen. Julie Morrison (left, D-Lake
Forest) and Sen. Mary Edly-Allen (middle, D-Libertyville) converse
on the Senate floor with Sen. Laura Fine, D-Glenview, earlier this
year. Morrison and Edly-Allen are the sponsors of two digital
privacy bills allowing civil action for victims of "deepfake porn"
and "doxing." (Capitol News Illinois photo by Jerry Nowcki)
HB 2123 would add “intentionally digitally altered” sexual images to the
existing law. It also expands the remedies in the existing law to allow
a court to grant the victim temporary restraining orders and injunctions
ordering the defendant to cease publication of the images in question.
A previous version of the bill passed unanimously in the House in March.
Because it was amended in the Senate, it now awaits further
consideration in the House.
Sen. Mary Edly-Allen, D-Libertyville, sponsored the bill and said that
the deepfake porn is part of a long history of gender-based harassment.
“This is a way to silence women,” Edly-Allen said of deepfakes.
Republicans voiced support for the bill and its previous versions in
both chambers of the Statehouse.
“We have to ensure that people’s privacy rights are protected and this
bill helps to do that,” Sen. Steve McClure, R-Springfield, said during
debate.
Edly-Allen said in an interview that the bill is a first step in a
broader conversation about the impact of evolving technologies like
artificial intelligence. She said she hopes to work with others in the
legislature to hold a hearing on the subject later this year.
“It can’t just be legislation,” Edly-Allen said in an interview. “We
also need literacy in schools. How do you tell what’s true and not
true?”
The ACLU of Illinois also opposed the deepfake porn bill. When the
measure was introduced, it would have allowed the subjects of any
digital forgery to sue the forgeries’ creators if they intended to cause
harm, incite violence or acted with reckless disregard toward the
subject. Amendments to the bill have since narrowed its scope to include
only sexually explicit images and videos.
“The bill has been markedly improved since it was introduced, but we
still have some concerns,” ACLU spokesman Ed Yohnka told Capitol News
Illinois. Yohnka said one potential free speech concern stems from the
proposal’s provision allowing temporary restraining orders prior to
adjudication.
Generative AI
The Senate last week also passed House Bill 3563, which would create a
task force to investigate natural language processing and generative
artificial intelligence. These technologies have drawn significant
attention in recent months thanks to services like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and
Google’s Bard.
The task force would be managed by the state’s Department of Innovation
and Technology and would include representatives from the agency, the
legislative caucuses, the state board of education, business
associations, labor associations and the attorney general’s office,
among others.
“It is a broad, broad task force because it is a broad, broad issue,”
bill sponsor Sen. Robert Peters, D-Chicago, said.
The bill now awaits concurrence in the House.
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news
service covering state government. It is distributed to hundreds of
print and broadcast outlets statewide. It is funded primarily by the
Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, along
with major contributions from the Illinois Broadcasters Foundation and
Southern Illinois Editorial Association. |