U.S. Supreme Court to hear dispute over Democratic bid for Trump hotel
documents
Send a link to a friend
[May 16, 2023]
By Andrew Chung
(Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a bid by
President Joe Biden's administration to block a lawsuit by several
congressional Democrats seeking details of a government lease for a
Washington hotel concerning when it was owned by his predecessor Donald
Trump.
The justices took up an appeal by the General Services Administration
(GSA), which manages federal government real estate, of a lower court's
ruling allowing the lawsuit by U.S. House of Representatives Democrats
to proceed. The lawmakers sued after the agency declined to provide
details of a 2013 lease of the Old Post Office building to the
Republican former president's company to convert it into a hotel.
The opulent hotel with a soaring clock tower, located on Pennsylvania
Avenue between the White House and the U.S. Capitol, opened shortly
before Trump was elected in 2016. The lease was sold last year for $375
million and rebranded as a Waldorf Astoria.
The hotel became a gathering spot for Trump supporters, lobbyists and
foreign dignitaries, who Democrats and watchdog groups complained could
patronize the hotel in order to curry favor with Trump when he was in
office.
Lawsuits accused Trump of violating the U.S. Constitution's
anti-corruption provisions by maintaining ownership of his businesses
including the Washington hotel while in office. The justices ordered
those cases dismissed because they became moot with Trump leaving office
in 2021 after his election loss to Biden, a Democrat.
The case pursued by the lawmakers tests whether small groups of
legislators have the proper legal standing to sue to enforce a federal
law aimed at obtaining information from federal agencies.
The law dates to 1928 and lets a minority on the 45-member House
Oversight and Reform Committee to request and receive information from
executive agencies. Under the so-called "seven-member rule," at least
seven members must make the request.
The GSA rejected several requests by a group of Democrats, whose party
was then - as today - the minority in the House, saying they did not
have the authority as individual members to conduct oversight.
[to top of second column]
|
Republican U.S. presidential candidate
Donald Trump (R) speaks to reporters while touring the construction
site of the Trump International Hotel at the Old Post Office
Building, following a news conference in Washington March 21, 2016.
REUTERS/Jim Bourg/File Photo
Seventeen Democratic members of the House Oversight and Reform
Committee sued in 2017 to compel disclosure of the information they
sought, including GSA's actions given that the lease agreement
prohibited elected officials from benefiting from the lease.
Some of the lawmakers who sued are no longer part of the committee
while some others are no longer in Congress. The action was led by
the committee's former top Democrat Elijah Cummings, who died in
2019.
A federal judge dismissed the case, finding that the committee
members did not as legislators suffer the kind of legal injury that
would entitle them to sue.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
revived the case in 2020, concluding: "A rebuffed request for
information to which the requester is statutorily entitled is a
concrete, particularized and individualized personal injury."
Biden's Justice Department, defending the GSA, appealed the case to
the Supreme Court, saying that the case could set an unwelcome
precedent by allowing just a few members of Congress, even fringe
members of a minority party, to distract and harass executive branch
officials.
"Such disputes between the political branches are properly resolved
through the long-established political process of negotiation and
compromise," the Justice Department told the justices in a filing.
(Reporting by Andrew Chung in New York; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|