Could Biden use the 14th Amendment to raise the debt ceiling?
Send a link to a friend
[May 22, 2023]
By Andy Sullivan and Jacqueline Thomsen
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Joe Biden on Sunday said he believes he
has the legal right to invoke the 14th Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution to raise the federal government's $31.4 trillion debt
ceiling but does not have the time to do so.
Some fellow Democrats have been urging him to try to use that untested
legal theory to bypass the Republican-controlled House of
Representatives and raise the borrowing limit.
WHAT IS THE 14TH AMENDMENT?
Section Four of 14th Amendment, adopted after the 1861-1865 Civil War,
states that the "validity of the public debt of the United States ...
shall not be questioned."
Historians say that aimed to ensure the federal government would not
repudiate its debts, as some former Confederate states had done.
But the clause has been largely unaddressed by the courts, and legal
experts disagree about what it requires from Congress and the
presidency.
Some, like Cornell University law professor Michael Dorf, say the "least
unconstitutional" option would be for Biden to act on his own to protect
the integrity of the national debt.
"That would mean borrowing money," he said.
Any action by Biden would surely prompt a lawsuit.
WHO COULD SUE OVER THE DEBT CEILING?
It's not clear who could bring a case. It could be difficult for any
plaintiff to prove they had been harmed by the action — a legal concept
known as "standing."
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1997 that individual lawmakers do not
have standing to file such lawsuits, but Congress could potentially vote
to say that it had been collectively harmed.
The high court could also opt to hear a challenge in the interest of
quickly resolving the issue, as they have done with Biden's move to
cancel $430 billion in student debt.
Any case would be in uncharted legal territory.
The Supreme Court has ruled on the public-debt clause only once, in a
1935 challenge to Democratic President Franklin Roosevelt's decision to
take the United States off the gold standard. The court ruled that the
plaintiff, a bondholder, did not have standing to file the case.
[to top of second column]
|
U.S. President Joe Biden delivers
remarks on "preventing a first-ever government default" during a
brief event prior to his departure for Japan, in the Roosevelt Room
at the White House in Washington, U.S., May 17, 2023. REUTERS/Kevin
Lamarque
Biden and Congress, meanwhile, would be under tremendous pressure to
resolve the issue quickly - meaning any case might be irrelevant
before it reaches the court.
WHERE DOES THE WHITE HOUSE STAND ON THE 14TH AMENDMENT?
The last time this was a front-burner issue in Washington in 2011
and 2013, prominent Democrats like former President Bill Clinton
urged then-President Barack Obama to invoke the 14th Amendment. But
White House aides said they did not believe they had the legal
authority to do so.
Biden on Sunday said he believed he did, but there was not enough
time for that strategy to pay off before June 1, when the Treasury
Department has warned that the government may not be able to pay all
its bills.
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen sounded a similar note on Sunday.
HOW WOULD MARKETS REACT IF BIDEN USES THE 14TH AMENDMENT?
Administration officials and economists have said that a default
triggered by a debt-ceiling breach would roil the world financial
system and plunge the United States into recession.
That immediate catastrophe might be avoided if Biden invoked the
14th Amendment.
But investors nevertheless could be spooked by the drama and demand
higher interest rates to reflect the increased risk while the legal
issues played out.
(Reporting by Andy Sullivan and Jacqueline Thomsen; Editing by Scott
Malone, Lisa Shumaker and Grant McCool)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|