Lawmakers OK bill to limit constitutional lawsuits to Cook, Sangamon
County
Send a link to a friend
[May 26, 2023]
By PETER HANCOCK
& HANNAH MEISEL
Capitol News Illinois
news@capitolnewsillinois.com
SPRINGFIELD – Democrats who control the General Assembly muscled through
a last-minute measure that will require any constitutional challenge to
state laws to be filed in either Cook or Sangamon counties.
The Illinois House on Thursday gave final passage to a set of amendments
to House Bill 3062, a measure supporters say is intended to put a stop
to what they describe as “venue shopping.” The Senate originally passed
the amendments on Friday, May 19, by a vote of 37-16. The House
concurred with those amendments by votes of 69-35. It clears the way for
the measure to head to Gov. JB Pritzker.
In the last few years, the state has been named as a defendant in a
flurry of lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of COVID-19-related
executive orders as well as high-profile laws eliminating cash bail and
banning assault-style weapons.
Litigation over those issues was filed in several of Illinois’ 102
counties, based on where various plaintiffs either lived or believed
their constitutional rights were violated. Similar suits were eventually
consolidated, but sometimes not until after judges from multiple
jurisdictions issued conflicting rulings, creating confusion until an
appellate court could rule on the matter.
“There has been considerable judge shopping as a tactic that has been
used by litigants to secure sweeping court orders blocking state
policies by steering cases to judges perceived to be sympathetic to
these causes,” the bill’s sponsor, Rep. Jay Hoffman, D-Swansea, said
during House debate Thursday.
Several of the COVID-19 lawsuits were filed in southern Illinois courts
by Bond County-based attorney Thomas DeVore. He gained statewide
notoriety through the lawsuits and went on to become the unsuccessful
Republican candidate for attorney general in 2022. DeVore was also the
lead attorney in an Effingham County lawsuit challenging the assault
weapons ban, one of two such suits currently on appeal before the
Illinois Supreme Court.
Hoffman didn’t mention DeVore by name but did reference the attorney’s
tactics during debate.
“One lawyer was charging people $200 just to have their name added as
plaintiffs to the lawsuit,” Hoffman said.
Democratic proponents of the bill argued that limiting proper judicial
venues to Cook and Sangamon counties is already law for certain types of
cases.
Senate President Don Harmon, D-Oak Park, said that because most
constitutional challenges against the state will inevitably end in an
appeal to the state’s high court, the Attorney General is currently
spending unnecessary resources fighting essentially the same case in
multiple counties.
“They all eventually end up in the (Illinois) Supreme Court,” Harmon
said during the Senate’s debate last week. “Which, by the way, sits in
Sangamon County and Cook County.”
[to top of second column]
|
Rep. Jay Hoffman, D-Swansea, is pictured
on the House floor Thursday during debate on a bill that would
require constitutional lawsuits against the state to be filed in
Cook or Sangamon County. (Capitol News Illinois photo by Jerry
Nowicki)
Hoffman described many of the lawsuits filed against the state in the
last few years as “frivolous” and echoed Harmon’s arguments about
straining the resources of the attorney general’s office.
But Republican Rep. Patrick Windhorst, of Metropolis, rejected that
argument, noting that Attorney General Kwame Raoul has been asking
lawmakers for additional authority to take on cases in other areas of
law throughout the spring session.
“This is the same attorney general's office that has requested from this
body additional authority to investigate and bring actions against
crisis pregnancy centers this session, to bring actions against and
investigate gun manufacturers this session,” Windhorst said Thursday.
“It doesn't seem that the Attorney General's Office is lacking resources
when they're constantly coming to this body requesting more authority to
do things. So I think that argument strains credulity.”
Windhorst also argued that while it may be an inconvenience for the
attorney general’s office to respond to cases in counties far from
Chicago or Springfield, it is equally inconvenient for constituents in
his district, which abuts the Ohio River, to seek justice far from their
homes.
“You know, where I live, I'm closer to the state capitol of Tennessee
than I am Illinois, and I'm almost as close to Atlanta, Georgia, as I am
Chicago, Illinois,” he said. “So to say if this body passes an
unconstitutional law, in order for me or another person in my community
to contest that law, I've got to travel a great distance and bear that
expense that comes with that, is not fair to the individuals in these
communities.”
If the bill becomes law, any future lawsuit challenging the
constitutionality of a state statute, rule or executive order would have
to be filed in either Cook or Sangamon County. The bill also states that
the legal doctrine of “forum non conveniens” – which holds that a court
can dismiss a case, even though it has jurisdiction, if another forum is
more convenient or appropriate – does not apply in such cases.
An additional amendment added in the Senate provides that the bill would
not apply to cases arising out of disputes between the state and labor
unions representing state employees.
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news
service covering state government. It is distributed to hundreds of
print and broadcast outlets statewide. It is funded primarily by the
Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, along
with major contributions from the Illinois Broadcasters Foundation and
Southern Illinois Editorial Association.
|