The
option comes as State Street and rivals move to devolve proxy
voting powers to shareholders on matters like director elections
or environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues.
The strategy could blunt criticism the companies, known for
their passive funds, have gotten from many sides over their
votes at corporate annual meetings.
State Street Global Advisors said in May that by next year some
investors of its index equity assets could influence their votes
by choosing among various policies offered by proxy adviser
Institutional Shareholder Services.
It has offered seven such policies including the ISS benchmark
policy and alternatives that allow investors to cast their votes
to emphasize things like socially responsible investing or
union-oriented voting priorities.
State Street also has offered the "ISS Global Board Aligned"
policy, created this year by ISS in a bid to assuage the
concerns of some U.S. Republican politicians who had criticized
the proxy advisor for supporting too many environmental or
social causes.
But even that policy directed some proxy votes to be cast
against boards' recommendations on governance questions like
executive pay or share structure, said Lori Heinel, global chief
investment officer at State Street Global Advisors.
She said the worry was the policy could be misunderstood given
its name, and worked with ISS to develop the new option. "The
angle here was, if you say you're aligned with management, let's
go all-in," she said.
State Street Global Advisors manages $3.7 trillion in all. Its
voting choice program has been open to institutional investors
to date, and will open to most retail investors starting on
Wednesday. Of its $1.7 trillion in index equity assets available
under the program, $1.36 trillion is currently eligible with the
remainder aimed to be available by the end of next year.
(Reporting by Ross Kerber; Editing by Stephen Coates)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|