US funding for Ukraine arms has poured into Pennsylvania, Arizona and
Texas
Send a link to a friend
[November 29, 2023]
By Mike Stone
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Biden administration has been circulating on
Capitol Hill the first breakdown of which U.S. states have benefited
from the billions of dollars spent on arming Ukraine, in a move to
gather more support from Republicans who have voted against aid for
Kyiv.
While three of the eight Republican members of Congress from
Pennsylvania have been voting against funding to help stop Russia's
invasion, the data shows the Keystone State has received $2.364 billion
- the most of any state - in spending and investments to build arms and
ammunition, according to documents seen by Reuters.
In Texas, 18 of the 25 Republican U.S. representatives have voted
against Ukraine aid. At the same time, Texas has received $1.45 billion
to produce 155 millimeter shells and other weapons. In Arizona, three of
six Republican representatives voted against aid while $2.196 billion
poured into the state.
During his latest request for $106 billion in new funds for Ukraine,
Israel, the Indo-Pacific region and border enforcement, U.S. President
Joe Biden on Oct. 20 emphasized that arms for Ukraine equals jobs for
Americans.
He noted some of the money would go to U.S. companies to replace
equipment sent abroad and mentioned Patriot missile systems that are
made by RTX's Raytheon in Arizona, and "artillery shells manufactured in
12 states across the country," naming Pennsylvania, Ohio and Texas.
Pennsylvania and Arizona are pivotal swing states that will be critical
to Biden next year.
In recent days the administration has circulated maps among lawmakers on
Capitol Hill showcasing the state-by-state breakdown for the $27 billion
worth of investments, and spending on "munitions and tactical vehicle
procurements."
A vocal bloc of Republicans has opposed sending aid to Ukraine, saying
taxpayer money should be spent at home, but a majority of Republicans
and Democrats in Congress still support aid to Ukraine President
Volodymyr Zelenskiy's government.
[to top of second column]
|
U.S. President Joe Biden announces an additional $800 million
security assistance package for Ukraine as he delivers an update on
U.S. efforts related to Russia's invasion, during a speech in the
Roosevelt Room at the White House in Washington, U.S., April 21,
2022. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo
Companies in four states on the Biden administration's map -
Arizona, Pennsylvania, Arkansas and Wisconsin - are home to
manufacturing facilities that are collectively receiving contracts
totaling more than $1 billion for their products that aid Ukraine.
Another $18 billion in contracts is spread around manufacturing
facilities located in more than two dozen other states.
The conservative Defending Democracy Together group's "Republicans
for Ukraine" campaign has been tracking Republican rhetoric and
voting patterns on Ukraine aid legislation. A report card by the
group gave "poor" or "very poor" grades to 18 of 25 Republican
representatives from Texas for their lack of support for Ukraine. It
gave "poor" or "very poor" grades to two of Wisconsin's six
Republican representatives, to one of Arkansas' four Republican
representatives and to three of Pennsylvania's eight Republican
representatives.
Still, further aid for Ukraine has a hard road ahead. In his first
major legislative act as Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson
introduced a bill addressing Biden's request for aid to Israel,
separating it from Ukraine and other needs.
Johnson told a news conference before the November Congressional
recess, "Ukraine will come in short order. It will come next."
Yet Johnson voted against Ukraine aid repeatedly before he became
speaker last month. House Democrats have overwhelmingly voted in
favor of the 2022 and 2023 Ukraine-related supplemental spending
bills.
(Reporting by Mike Stone in Washington; Editing by Chris Sanders and
Matthew Lewis)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |