US Supreme Court poised to OK S. Carolina voting map deemed racially
biased by lower court
Send a link to a friend
[October 12, 2023]
By John Kruzel and Andrew Chung
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court's conservative majority on
Wednesday appeared poised to revive a Republican-drawn electoral map in
South Carolina that was blocked by a lower court for racial bias after
30,000 Black residents were moved out of a congressional district.
During arguments in a case that could help decide control of the U.S.
House of Representatives in the 2024 elections, the conservative
justices signaled sympathy toward arguments made by South Carolina
officials defending the changes in composition of the district as driven
by partisan benefit for Republicans.
At issue was a map adopted last year by the Republican-led state
legislature that redrew the boundaries of one of South Carolina's seven
U.S. House of Representatives districts - one that includes parts of
Charleston along the Atlantic coast.
A federal three-judge panel in January ruled that the map sorted voters
along racial lines and diminished the clout of Black voters in violation
of the U.S. Constitution's 14th and 15th Amendments, which guarantee
equal protection under the law and prohibit race-based voting
discrimination.
Black voters tend to favor Democratic candidates.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2023/Oct/12/images/ads/current/chicagost_sda_FOOTBALL_2023.png)
A practice called gerrymandering involves the manipulation of electoral
district boundaries to marginalize a certain set of voters and increase
the influence of others. In this case, the state legislature was accused
of racial gerrymandering to reduce the influence of Black voters in
South Carolina's 1st congressional district.
Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts expressed skepticism that the
plaintiffs - Black voters who challenged the map - met their burden in
the case, noting that they challenged the it "without any direct
evidence, with no alternative map, with no odd-shape districts which we
often get in gerrymandering cases."
Roberts added, "Have we ever had a case before where all it is is
circumstantial evidence?"
The Republican legislators and other state officials who appealed the
lower court's ruling argued that the map was designed to secure partisan
advantages, a practice that the Supreme Court in 2019 decided was not
reviewable by federal courts - unlike racial gerrymandering, which
remains illegal.
Conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch wondered whether the challengers had
overcome the presumption of good faith courts must give legislatures.
"Here, there's no evidence that the legislature could have achieved its
partisan tilt - which everyone says is permissible - in any other way,"
Gorsuch said.
The new map increased the district's share of white voters while
reducing its share of Black voters, which the lower court referred to as
"bleaching." The Republicans faulted those judges for finding that the
district's composition was motivated primarily by race rather than
Republican interests.
[to top of second column]
|
![](../images/101223PIX/news_u25.jpg)
The United States Supreme Court building is seen as in Washington,
U.S., October 4, 2023. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2023/Oct/12/images/ads/current/llm_lda_FOOTBALL_2023.png)
Leah Aden, a lawyer with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund who argued on
behalf of challengers to the map, said the evidentiary record
"reflects that there was a racial target, it reflects that there was
a significant sorting of Black people, it reflects unrebutted expert
evidence of race rather than party explaining the assignment of
voters."
'I DON'T BELIEVE THAT'
The court's liberal justices questioned the arguments made to defend
the map.
"Your defense was, 'We didn't look at the racial data for this
purpose.' And what the (lower) court said was, 'I don't believe
that,'" liberal Justice Elena Kagan told a lawyer arguing for South
Carolina.
The eventual ruling by the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3
conservative majority, may determine whether Democrats have a
realistic shot to win the 1st district, currently represented by
Republican Nancy Mace.
The map shifted 30,000 Black residents into the neighboring 6th
congressional district that stretches 125 miles (200 km) inland from
Charleston. These voters were unlawfully "exiled," the three-judge
panel wrote. The 6th district has been held for three decades by
Democrat Jim Clyburn, one of the most prominent Black members of
Congress. Clyburn's is the only one of South Carolina's House
districts held by a Democrat.
Legislative districts across the United States are redrawn to
reflect population changes documented in the nationwide census
conducted every decade.
With the district's previous boundaries in place, Mace only narrowly
defeated an incumbent Democrat in 2020 - by just over 1 percentage
point, or 5,400 votes. With the redistricting, Mace won re-election
in 2022 by 14 percentage points.
The parties in the case have asked the Supreme Court to decide the
case by the end of the year to enable the map to be finalized ahead
of the Nov. 5, 2024, congressional elections.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2023/Oct/12/images/ads/current/friendshipmanor_sda_FOOTBALL_2023.png)
Similar legal battles over electoral maps in other states could
influence which party ends up controlling the House. The Supreme
Court in June ruled against Alabama Republicans in one such case,
ordering that state to devise a second majority-Black U.S. House
district in a ruling that gave a boost to Democrats. Republicans
hold a slim 221-212 House margin.
(Reporting by John Kruzel; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |