The
San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday
on a 7-4 vote stayed a judge's Sept. 22 ruling finding the
state's ban violated gun owners' rights to keep and bear arms
under the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment.
The ruling came in a long-running lawsuit by the California
Rifle & Pistol Association and gun owners challenging the ban.
U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez in San Diego in siding with
them had cited a 2022 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, New
York State Rifle & Pistol Association v Bruen, requiring that
firearms restrictions be "consistent with this nation's
historical tradition of firearm regulation" to pass muster.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, quickly moved
to stay that decision, and on Monday, the 9th Circuit's majority
agreed with Bonta that the law likely remained valid even under
the conservative-majority Supreme Court's ruling.
The court said that federal judges nationally had largely upheld
large-capacity magazine restrictions since the Supreme Court
ruled and that a decision to the contrary could threaten public
safety.
"If a stay is denied, California will indisputably face an
influx of large-capacity magazines like those used in mass
shootings in California and elsewhere," the judges, all
appointees of presidents who were Democrats, wrote.
Four judges appointed by Republican presidents dissented,
including U.S. Circuit Judge Patrick Bumatay, who called the
court's attitude toward the Second Amendment in this and other
cases "laughably absurd."
Bonta in a statement said his office was "relieved that the
court considered the public safety of Californians in its
decision."
Chuck Michel, the president of the California Rifle & Pistol
Association, in a statement expressed disappointment and vowed
to "defend the rights of gun owners in California all the way to
the Supreme Court."
Benitez had struck down the magazines ban once before in 2019,
but the 9th Circuit overturned him in 2021. The Supreme Court
vacated the appeals court ruling and ordered new proceedings
consistent with the Bruen decision.
(Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; editing by Jonathan Oatis)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2022 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|