Montana's TikTok ban faces skeptical US judge
Send a link to a friend
[October 13, 2023]
By David Shepardson
(Reuters) -A U.S. judge on Thursday heard arguments on Montana's
first-of-its kind state ban on the use of short-video-sharing app TikTok,
considering a legal challenge before it is set to take effect on Jan. 1.
U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy, considering a court challenge from
TikTok and users, questioned the state attorney general's office at a
hearing on the state's ban which was approved by the legislature.
He noted that no other state has followed suit to ban TikTok. "Does that
seem a little strange to you?" Molloy asked during the hour-long hearing
in Missoula, Montana.
TikTok, which is owned by China's ByteDance, sued in May, seeking to
block the U.S. state ban on several grounds, arguing that it violates
the First Amendment free speech rights of the company and users. A
separate lawsuit has been filed by TikTok users in Montana.
TikTok, which has more than 150 million U.S. users, is used by more than
a third of Montana residents, the company says.
Molloy, who was appointed to the bench by Democratic President Bill
Clinton, separately questioned the state's argument that the ban is
necessary to protect the data of TikTok users in the state and
questioned if the state was being "paternalistic."
"Everybody on TikTok voluntarily gives their personal data. So if they
want to give that information to whatever the platform is, how is it
that you can protect them?" Molloy asked.
He suggested he state was saying, "These people don't know what they're
doing. They're exposing themselves to the Chinese military. So we need
to say 'ban Tiktok citizens from exercising certain individual
liberties.'"
[to top of second column]
|
A 3D printed Tik Tok logo is placed on a keyboard in front of U.S.
flag in this illustration taken October 6, 2020. Picture taken
October 6, 2020. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File photo
Molloy said he would rule as quickly as possible.
Montana Solicitor General Christian Corrigan said states often act
alone and cited California's recent restrictions on food additives.
"Just because one state is the first to do something, doesn't mean
it's necessarily out of step," Corrigan said.
Corrigan also argued the state could act even if consumers handed
over data voluntarily, comparing it to residents using an offshore
sports gambling website that posed a risk to consumers of having
credit card numbers stolen.
TikTok lawyer Alexander Berengaut said in the hearing the Montana
ban ran afoul of the First Amendment and was also pre-empted by
federal law because the state was trying "to declare a foreign
policy for the state of Montana" - a matter left to the federal
government.
On Tuesday, Utah sued TikTok, accusing it of harming children by
intentionally keeping young users spending unhealthy amounts of time
on the short-video sharing platform. The lawsuit is similar to
actions brought by Indiana and Arkansas.
(Reporting by David Shepardson in WashingtonEditing by Matthew
Lewis)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|