The bill would have given Ameren Illinois the right-of-first
refusal on transmission line construction projects, thus
eliminating the competitive bidding process.
Transmission line planning is big business, and opponents say
banning competition is a surefire way to increase costs at the
expense of utility customers.
Illinois lawmakers who approved the legislation on the last day
of spring session argued the proposals would generate more
utility worker union jobs in the state.
Gov. J.B. Pritzker issued an amendatory veto in August, striking
out only the portion of the measure that deals with the
right-of-first refusal.
“Competition is important and we want to keep costs down for our
customers across the state and having a competitive environment
helps do that,” said Pritzker.
Jason Heffley, the Illinois State Director for Americans for
Prosperity, sent a letter to lawmakers urging opposition to the
legislation.
“We wanted to put folks on notice that we are going to be
pushing hard during the upcoming veto session to make sure that
the veto is sustained or that the veto is not overridden,” said
Heffley to The Center Square.
At least a dozen states have adopted laws that give local
utilities a right-of-first refusal to build transmission line
projects, including Iowa and Indiana.
Ameren has testified in other states considering similar
legislation that the competitive bidding process leads to delays
and cost overruns.
During the upcoming veto session in Springfield, lawmakers will
have the option of accepting the governor’s changes, overriding
the governor’s veto so that the bill becomes law, or letting the
legislation go by the wayside.
|
|