Mood swing: Global producers in US hunt for China alternatives
Send a link to a friend
[October 23, 2023] By
Timothy Aeppel
(Reuters) - Jason Andringa’s company was part of the stampede of U.S.
businesses that built factories in China.
Iowa-based Vermeer, a 4,000-employee maker of industrial and farm
machinery, opened a plant there two decades ago—and Andringa, the
company’s president and CEO, frequently visited what many be considered
the world’s premier fast-growing, future-oriented economy. But the mood
of Vermeer and many other global producers has turned sour on China.
"If we didn’t already have a plant in China, we sure wouldn’t start one
now," he said.
He has no plan to leave and is pleased with the operation, but said he
would not expand there given the tensions in the U.S.-China relationship
that seem more likely than not to escalate. He worries it could be
increasingly difficult to find employees and receive fair treatment in a
country that is mutually antagonistic with the U.S.
The latest example of that hit Tuesday, when the Biden administration
said it plans to halt shipments to China of more advanced artificial
intelligence chips designed by Nvidia and others. The move is aimed at
curbing Beijing's access to cutting-edge technology that could be used
in weapons.
Surveys now show U.S. business leaders are eager to cut back their China
exposure and are shifting investment to other, friendlier countries.
This is a radical shift from the days when offshoring production to
China was rewarded by Wall Street and investor calls often highlighted
multi-million-dollar expansions in the world’s second-largest economy.
Mexico has surpassed China as the top destination for foreign direct
investment by U.S. firms, according to the U.S. Bureau of Economic
Analysis, while a survey from the U.S.-China Business Council shows a
growing number of U.S. firms pulling back on their China investments.
ACCELERATING EXODUS
Souring trade relations would likely be a key topic if U.S. President
Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping meet next month during the
Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum in San Francisco. The White
House is working to arrange a meeting, though the plans remain
unsettled.
The move away from China began on a small scale during the Trump
administration’s trade war, as producers shifted supply chains to
sidestep the cost of tariffs.
The exodus has intensified as relations between Beijing and Washington
have continued to deteriorate under the Biden administration, morphing
from a trade battle into a geopolitical struggle over Taiwan and the
U.S. downing of China's spy balloon.
After a visit to China in August, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said
U.S. companies had complained to her that China has become "uninvestible,"
due to government actions such as fines and raids that have made it
risky to do business in the country.
"We have businesses doing full exits from China," said Matt Dollard, a
senior analyst at RSM US, a consulting firm that focuses on mid-market
companies.
[to top of second column] |
Container ships and oil tankers wait in the ocean outside the Port
of Long Beach-Port of Los Angeles complex in Los Angeles,
California, U.S., April 7, 2021. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson/File Photo
For instance, Dollard is working with a group of auto suppliers who
plan to be entirely out of China within three years, he said. But
many find it isn’t easy to leave a country that developed such a
vast production base. In many cases, they end up expanding
operations in other countries that still require parts and raw
materials from China to produce finished goods.
CAUGHT IN CHINA'S WEB
The mood swing against China is visible in the numbers. An annual
survey by the U.S.-China Business Council, conducted in June and
July, showed more than a third of respondents have cut or paused
their investments in China over the past year—a record high and far
above the 22% who said that in last year’s survey. Most of the
respondents to the survey are large U.S.-based multinationals.
The group said geopolitics is the "single largest issue weighing
down business sentiment over the long term." However only a few of
the firms indicated they plan to fully exit China.
Faced with these pressures, many companies are pursuing a so-called
China-plus-one strategy. Rather than expand in China, these
companies are directing new investments to other low-cost countries
such as Vietnam and India.
To be sure, some companies are doubling down on China. Ryan Gunnigle,
CEO of Atlanta-based toy maker Kids2, said he is continuing to
invest in his China factories, adding both automation and new
capacity. Gunnigle, in an email, said he is doing a few projects in
Vietnam, "but nothing of significance" because China continues to
have the combination of a strong infrastructure, high quality
producers, and low costs necessary in the toy business.
"POLITICAL" CONCERNS
Meanwhile, companies that are pushing to build new factories or find
existing suppliers in other countries face a common problem: they
often end up still relying heavily on Chinese factories for parts
and materials.
Jim Estill is wrangling with this issue. The CEO of Danby
Appliances, a Canadian company that sells over half of its products
in the U.S., got 85% of its goods from Chinese factories five years
ago. He’s been steadily moving to suppliers in places like Turkey
and hopes to have his Chinese supply base down to 50% in the next
year.
Danby also has its own factories in the U.S. and Canada that do
final assembly of some products and has spent over $20 million over
the past few years to buy operations in Canada that can supply parts
to those factories. Those parts would have previously come from
China, said Estill.
"My concerns are primarily political," he said. "We could wake up
tomorrow and find out China invades Taiwan." That would shatter his
business.
(Reporting by Timothy Aeppel; Editing by Anna Driver)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |