Elon Musk's X Corp sues California to undo content moderation law
Send a link to a friend
[September 09, 2023] By
Jonathan Stempel
(Reuters) -Elon Musk's X Corp sued California on Friday over a state law
establishing new transparency rules for social media companies,
requiring them to publish their policies for policing disinformation,
harassment, hate speech and extremism.
X, the social media platform once known as Twitter, said the law known
as Assembly Bill 587 violates its free speech rights under the U.S.
Constitution's First Amendment and California's state constitution.
In a complaint filed in federal court in Sacramento, California, X said
the law's "true intent" was to pressure social media companies into
eliminating content the state found objectionable.
By doing so, California is forcing companies to adopt the state's views
on politically charged issues, "a form of compelled speech in and of
itself," X said.
After buying Twitter for $44 billion last October, Musk, a
self-described free speech absolutist, laid off many employees
responsible for monitoring and regulating content, and restored some
accounts that prior management had banned.
The Anti-Defamation League and the Center for Countering Digital Hate
have documented increases in the volume of hate speech on X targeting
Jews, Black people, gay men and trans people since Musk took over.
Musk, the world's richest person, also runs the electric car company
Tesla and space exploration company SpaceX.
The office of California Attorney General Rob Bonta, which enforces
state laws, said it will respond to the complaint in court.
[to top of second column] |
'X' logo is seen on the top of the headquarters of the messaging
platform X, formerly known as Twitter, in downtown San Francisco,
California, U.S., July 30, 2023. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo
AB 587 requires social media companies with at least $100 million of
gross annual revenue to issue semiannual reports that describe their
content moderation practices, and provide data on the numbers of
objectionable posts and how they were addressed.
The law also requires companies to provide copies of their terms of
service. Failure to comply risks civil fines of up to $15,000 per
violation per day.
Gavin Newsom, California's Democratic governor, signed the law last
September, saying the state would not let social media be "weaponized"
to spread hate and disinformation.
Musk laid off thousands of employees after buying Twitter, and on
Monday blamed critics, including the ADL for a 60% decline in U.S.
advertising revenue.
In a recent interview, A.J. Brown, who resigned in June as X's head
of brand safety and ad quality, said policy changes adopted by Musk
that limited the visibility of objectionable posts on X rather than
removing them made it difficult to convince advertisers the platform
was safe.
The case is X Corp v Bonta, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of
California, No. 23-at-00903.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by David
Gregorio and Aurora Ellis)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |