Disparately resourced public defenders prepare for the end of cash bail 
		in Illinois
		
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		[September 16, 2023]  
		By HANNAH MEISEL 
		Capitol News Illinois 
		hmeisel@capitolnewsillinois.com 
		 
		
		 Illinois on Monday will become the first state to fully abolish cash 
		bail through an act of the legislature — a major criminal justice 
		overhaul spurred by the advocacy of a progressive faction of the 
		Democratic Party that’s grown increasingly powerful in recent years. 
		 
		The reform goes into effect after nearly three years of brutal 
		legislative and political fights over the SAFE-T Act, one of several 
		massive pieces of equity-focused legislation pushed by the Illinois 
		Legislative Black Caucus in the wake of nationwide protests in 2020 over 
		injustices faced by Black Americans and systemic racism more broadly. 
		 
		Criminal justice reform advocates have been working toward Monday’s 
		rollout for years, beginning with the premise that an arrestee’s ability 
		to post bond does not equate with the danger he or she poses to the 
		community. While some charged with violent crimes like domestic battery 
		were able to buy their way out of jail under the old system, others were 
		left sitting in jail for weeks or months because they can’t afford bail, 
		sometimes for low-level offenses. 
		 
		This cost some their jobs, homes or even parental rights in the process. 
		 
		“As a defender, one of the hardest things I have to do is have 
		conversations with mothers, sisters…how are they gonna pull together the 
		money to get their person out of jail?” Cook County Public Defender 
		Sharone Mitchell, who was heavily involved in crafting the law in his 
		previous job at the Illinois Justice Project, said at a recent media 
		briefing about the end of cash bail. 
		 
		“Judges never had crystal balls and never will have crystal balls,” he 
		said, adding that he believes the Pretrial Fairness Act – the bail 
		reform portion of the wider-ranging SAFE-T Act – will help improve 
		judges’ decision-making when considering whether to detain an arrestee. 
		
		
		  
		
		But while the end of cash bail is supposed to create a more equal 
		justice system, the months of preparation leading up to the SAFE-T Act’s 
		full implementation have accentuated profound disparities between the 
		court systems in each of Illinois’ 102 counties. 
		 
		And no matter how the local officials feel about the end of cash bail 
		and the state’s overhaul on pretrial procedures, they’re responsible for 
		implementing the law with whatever resources they have – a reality even 
		some of the law’s most ardent opponents have acknowledged. 
		 
		Counties face disparate resource challenges 
		 
		Some bigger counties are better prepared than others for the changes 
		required by the PFA. Cook County, for example, is one of a few counties 
		that has for years been moving toward limiting the use of cash bail. 
		Additionally, the county’s criminal courthouse on Chicago’s near-south 
		side has for years been holding bond court every day of the week – a 
		practice shared by other larger county court systems in Illinois. 
		 
		Beginning Monday, that courthouse will hold initial appearance hearings 
		at midday, along with longer detention hearings every morning and 
		afternoon. During a media briefing last week, Cook County Judge Mary 
		Marubio, who presides over the county’s pretrial division, outlined how 
		these hearings will be organized across multiple courtrooms in the 
		criminal courthouse in Chicago. 
		 
		“It’s not so different from how we release people now, it’s just that 
		money will no longer be a condition of release,” Marubio said. 
		 
		Mitchell has also been beefing up his staff at the public defender’s 
		office since he was appointed in early 2021. A spokesperson for the 
		office said increasing staffing was a priority for Mitchell regardless 
		of the PFA’s requirements, and the office has hired “well over 100” new 
		attorneys since 2021. Mitchell also created a Pretrial Division in 
		anticipation of bail reform’s original Jan. 1 implementation date, and 
		21 attorneys have been assigned to that unit. 
		 
		It’s an entirely different story in southeastern Illinois, where Nathan 
		Rowland is the part-time public defender serving Gallatin County, which 
		borders Indiana, and neighboring Hamilton County. Those counties have a 
		combined population of nearly 13,000, per 2020 U.S. Census data. 
		 
		Rowland, who serves as president of the Illinois Council of Chief 
		Defenders, is one of a handful of part-time public defenders in Illinois 
		who contract with more than one county. But his status as a part-time 
		public defender is much less rare; more than half of Illinois’ 102 
		counties don’t have full-time public defenders. 
		 
		Per state law — which hasn’t been updated since 1949 — only counties 
		with 35,000 or more residents are required to set up offices of public 
		defender, and even then, they’re not required to be full-time. Counties 
		with populations of less than 35,000 aren’t required to establish a 
		public defender program, though in modern history even the smallest of 
		counties have at least contracted part-time public defenders, while 
		others have voluntarily hired full-time PDs. 
		 
		Rowland does his public defender work out of his law office in 
		McLeansboro in Hamilton County, appearing in court across the two 
		counties as needed when he’s assigned clients who can’t afford an 
		attorney — usually after defendants’ initial bond hearings. But after 
		Monday, his presence will be required at every initial condition and 
		pretrial detention hearing for newly arrested defendants. Rowland noted 
		that this is a much greater challenge for judicial systems in rural 
		areas of the state than it is in counties like Cook. 
		
		
		  
		
		While supportive of bail reform, Rowland also predicts the first several 
		months under the new pretrial system will be difficult, especially in 
		places with judicial systems vastly different than places like Cook and 
		the collar counties. 
		 
		“They're used to running court all day every day anyway,” he said of 
		Cook County’s existing bond court schedule. “In other parts of the 
		state, we're doing something that we have never done before and have not 
		been set up to do.” 
		 
		Late last month, the Illinois Supreme Court issued an order allowing 
		pretrial hearings to take place remotely for six months. Rowland said 
		without the ability to use videoconference technology for the pretrial 
		hearings, counties like his would be unable to comply with the PFA’s 
		requirement that arrestees appear in front of a judge within 48 hours. 
		 
		It’s not just Rowland’s limitations as a single part-time public 
		defender serving two counties; he noted that getting all parties 
		together in one courtroom has always been difficult. Neither Gallatin 
		nor Hamilton counties run their own jails, so arrangements must be made 
		with the sheriff’s office from the White and Saline county jails to 
		transport detainees. 
		 
		Court reporters are also in short supply, and state’s attorneys offices 
		in some counties are also one-person operations, Rowland said. Judges 
		also travel from courthouse to courthouse in the 12 mostly rural 
		counties of the state’s Second Judicial Circuit. 
		 
		“In both of the counties that I practice in, after Thursday at noon, 
		generally there's no judge in the county until Monday at 9 (a.m.),” 
		Rowland said. “We don't have judges assigned to either of these counties 
		on Fridays at all…Some counties only have a judge scheduled twice a week 
		or three times a week.” 
		 
		Even before the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the adoption of virtual 
		hearings, Rowland said local court systems had started experimenting 
		with remote court, and he predicted those lessons would help after 
		Monday. But if he or another person whose presence is required for 
		pretrial hearings gets sick or goes on vacation, Rowland said the cases 
		would likely just have to be rescheduled. 
		 
		Nearly 100 miles northwest of Rowland’s law office, St. Clair County 
		Public Defender Cathy MacElroy is gearing up for what she expects to be 
		a rocky road for the next two years. In December, just weeks before cash 
		bail was originally set to end in Illinois, MacElroy alerted the 
		county’s chief judge that her office’s workload was so dire, the public 
		defender could no longer accept any new cases. 
  
		
		
		  
		
		 
		[to top of second column] 
			 | 
            
             
            
			  
            Capitol News Illinois file photo 
            
			  
		At the time, the five full-time attorneys in the office were each 
		handling more than 350 cases in 2022 — well above the American Bar 
		Association’s recommended guideline of 150. Since then, MacElroy said 
		things got better, but the reprieve didn’t last. County officials made 
		the public defender job full-time in January, and MacElroy was able to 
		increase the base pay for attorneys in her office and recruit two more 
		defenders. 
		 
		Attorneys in the public defender’s office have since lowered their 
		caseloads down to around 200 cases per year, but MacElroy expects that 
		number to begin climbing again after Monday. 
		 
		“We have a lot of violent crime in the county,” she said. “Each of my 
		full-time lawyers has at least 10 murder (cases)…And this week in my 
		county from Friday until now there have been five murders charged. I 
		don't know what happened in the last week, but that's kind of like what 
		we're dealing with. We get rid of one (case) and five more appear.” 
		 
		Additionally, in recent months, the public defender’s office has lost 
		two full-time lawyers, including one who moved over to the state’s 
		attorney’s office and is making roughly $10,000 more, MacElroy said. 
		 
		She’s already hired a recent law school graduate who expects to be fully 
		licensed in November and is hopeful to hire an eighth attorney. But the 
		competition for public interest attorneys is fierce, MacElroy said, as 
		“every state’s attorney and public defender's office in the state 
		basically is hiring right now” due to the demands of Illinois’ pretrial 
		overhaul. 
		 
		The state has appropriated $10 million for public defenders to help 
		implement the Pretrial Fairness Act, with the state’s 101 counties 
		outside of Cook each receiving between $77,000 and $147,555. 
		 
		While MacElroy is grateful for that funding – and generally supportive 
		of the concept of ending cash bail – she said St. Clair County’s portion 
		of that appropriation isn’t as much as she’d hoped, especially if it’s 
		funding that won’t be reallocated in future years. 
		 
		Beginning next week, those already jailed can petition for hearings to 
		be released under the PFA’s guidelines. They would be entitled to a 
		detention hearing on a timeline set in law based on the seriousness of 
		their alleged crime. 
		 
		For Rowland’s area of the state, this is not a big number. 
		 
		“In one county we've got two people in custody and we know we're gonna 
		have hearings on them on Monday,” Rowland said. “In another county, I’ve 
		got three people in custody and I'm gonna be having hearings on them on 
		Wednesday.” 
		 
		In Cook County, current detainees numbered nearly 5,400 on Friday, 
		according to the sheriff’s daily report. Mitchell said last week that 
		petitions for pretrial release within the current jail population would 
		be assessed on a “case-by-case basis.” 
		 
		MacElroy predicts the group of 150 or so current St. Clair County Jail 
		detainees she already filed petitions for could have their days in court 
		and released within the next week. She added that the county’s state’s 
		attorney’s office has also filed detention petitions for approximately 
		250 people currently in jail. As those cases all fall under the 
		detainable crimes according to the law, MacElroy predicted they’ll be 
		heard over the next few months. 
		 
		Help from the state 
		 
		Illinois is one of seven states without any oversight mechanism for 
		monitoring how effectively counties’ court systems help defendants 
		exercise their right to counsel for trial via the public defender’s 
		office, according to a 2021 study commissioned by the Illinois Supreme 
		Court. The resulting report from the Boston-based Sixth Amendment Center 
		warned that Illinois’ framework limits the independence of public 
		defenders and makes for inadequate representation in counties where PDs 
		are overworked. 
		 
		More than half of states directly fund public defenders instead of 
		leaving funding up to counties like Illinois does. 
			
		
		  
			
		While the state isn’t any closer to creating a statewide public defender 
		system, the Illinois Office of Statewide Pretrial Services represents a 
		major step forward in providing resources to judicial systems across the 
		state. As of October 1, OSPS will partner with 71 counties. For months, 
		it’s been offering services like compiling information about new 
		arrestees. OSPS is also charged with helping connect those who are 
		released from jail with services like drug treatment or anger 
		management, whether voluntary or ordered by the court. 
		 
		The agency has hired pretrial service officers embedded in 47 of the 71 
		OSPS-affiliated counties so far Those officers are responsible for 
		quickly preparing reports on new arrestees’ criminal histories and 
		professional backgrounds based on interviews with the defendant and 
		associated fact-checking. The reports are then sent to public defenders, 
		state’s attorneys and judges. 
		 
		A few dozen counties in Illinois already had their own versions of 
		pretrial service offices. But OSPS has lightened the load for some of 
		them, like the court’s probation department in St. Clair County, which 
		opted into OSPS. 
		 
		But in counties that have never had any formalized pretrial service 
		office, Rowland said OSPS’ work has proven extremely helpful to the 
		entire judicial system, but particularly to his work as a public 
		defender. Prior to last year, he said he’d walk into hearings totally 
		blind, having never met his client and not knowing “anything about him.” 
		 
		“Right before the hearing…I’d be standing over in the corner (saying), 
		‘This is what you've been charged with. Where you living? You got a 
		job?’” Rowland said. “I (didn’t) know any of that.” 
		 
		Pretrial service officers begin their days early in the morning, and 
		Rowland said he’s been receiving reports on new arrestees oftentimes 
		before 8 a.m. 
		 
		In August, OSPS began oversight of electronic monitoring in 
		participating counties, and began picking up the tab for those ordered 
		to wear the GPS tracking devices – fees that would sometimes drive the 
		poorest defendants into debt. 
		 
		MacElroy said she was glad her clients would no longer be saddled with 
		the cost, but also noted that in St. Clair County, electronic monitoring 
		isn’t used “a ton.” 
		 
		She predicted that under the PFA, judges might even order ankle monitors 
		less often, as prosecutors would have to present specific findings for 
		why the GPS tracking would be necessary. The PFA requires judges to find 
		the “least restrictive” pretrial conditions necessary for a defendant, 
		and the law provides that individuals on electronic monitoring can have 
		two days per week to move freely so they can accomplish daily tasks. 
			
		
		  
			
		But despite the assistance OSPS is giving, not all areas of the state 
		will adopt electronic monitoring. In rural southeastern Illinois, for 
		example, defendants typically had not been able to afford the daily fees 
		associated with ankle monitor use, so electronic monitoring has 
		historically been rare. But, as Rowland pointed out, many rural areas 
		face a much more basic logistical hurdle: large swaths of land with 
		neither cell phone coverage nor reliable broadband — or even landline — 
		service. 
		 
		“Well, you've lost signal,” Rowland imagined an OSPS employee saying as 
		they cite a defendant for non-compliance. “Well, what does that mean? 
		They've tampered with the device or they've just lost signal because of 
		where they're at?” 
		 
		Rowland said defense attorneys would be “on guard against” increased use 
		of electronic monitoring in his area of the state, saying he worries it 
		could set his clients up for failure in the judicial system. 
			
		
		Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news 
		service covering state government. It is distributed to hundreds of 
		newspapers, radio and TV stations statewide. It is funded primarily by 
		the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, 
		along with major contributions from the Illinois Broadcasters Foundation 
		and Southern Illinois Editorial Association.  |