Feinstein's death poses two big questions for US Senate Democrats
Send a link to a friend
[September 30, 2023]
By Richard Cowan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The death of trailblazing U.S. Senator Dianne
Feinstein presented her fellow Democrats with two key questions on
Friday: Who will replace her in the chamber and who will take her seat
on the committee that approves federal judges.
The answer to the first question is easy: California Democratic Governor
Gavin Newsom will name a successor, who he has promised will be a Black
woman.
Filling the 90-year-old lawmaker's seat on the Senate Judiciary
Committee touches one of the most critical levers of partisan power in
Washington and will require cooperation from Republicans.
Democrats' majority in the chamber has temporarily shrunk by one, to
50-49, following the death of Feinstein, who had been sidelined for a
month earlier this year by a bout of shingles.
The vacancy should not pose an immediate problem for Senate Majority
Leader Chuck Schumer in a standoff with House of Representatives
Republicans over the looming government shutdown, since the Senate is
advancing a bipartisan bill to keep agencies funded, which cleared a
procedural hurdle on Thursday in a 76-22 vote.
"Earlier this morning, we lost a giant in the Senate," an emotional
Schumer said on Friday.
EYES ON NEWSOM
Newsom, a rising star in the Democratic Party, has the authority to name
a successor to fill Feinstein's seat through the end of her term in
January 2025. He is virtually certain to name a Democrat and has said
the candidate will be a Black woman who does not plan to run in the
November 2024 election for a full six-year term.
"There is simply nobody who possessed the poise, gravitas and fierceness
of Dianne Feinstein," Newsom said. Newsom did not respond to a request
for further comment.
Feinstein in February said she would not seek reelection, and contenders
began lining up for her seat.
The California primary is March 5 with a Dec. 8 filing deadline for
prospective candidates. The last time a Republican held a Senate seat in
the heavily Democratic state was 1992.
Democrats and Republicans can run in the same primary, with the top two
vote-getters, regardless of party affiliation, facing off in the general
election.
Liberal U.S. Representative Barbara Lee is running for the seat, as are
other prominent Democrats including U.S. Representatives Adam Schiff and
Katie Porter.
[to top of second column]
|
Senator Dianne Feinstein is brought to a Senate Judiciary Committee
executive business meeting to vote on legislation and pending
nominations before the committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, May
11, 2023. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
JUDICIARY VACANCY
Feinstein's death leaves a 10-10 deadlock on the Judiciary
Committee, which is in charge of reviewing presidential nominations
to federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court.
With the Republican-controlled House blocking most attempts at
bipartisan legislation, the Democratic Senate has focused this year
on approving Democratic President Joe Biden's judicial nominees. It
has approved 143 since Biden took office in January 2021.
That's an attempt to balance Biden's Republican predecessor Donald
Trump's 234 appointments over four years, including three Supreme
Court justices that cemented a 6-3 conservative majority.
Any move by Schumer to fill Feinstein's seat on the panel with
another Democrat would need Republican cooperation in a vote by the
full Senate.
Earlier this year, Republicans blocked a request by Schumer to allow
a temporary Democratic stand-in on the Judiciary Committee while
Feinstein recuperated. Historically, the Senate has not stood in the
way of filling committee vacancies caused by a member's death.
Senate Republicans said on Friday they do not intend to contest a
move to replace Feinstein on the committee after her death.
But they have broken precedent around judicial appointments before,
most notably in 2016 when top Senate Republican Mitch McConnell
refused a vote on Democratic President Barack Obama's nominee to
succeed conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, saying it was
inappropriate to do so in an election year.
(Reporting by Richard Cowan; additional reporting by Patricia
Zengerle; Editing by Scott Malone and Cynthia Osterman)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|