Why Republicans impeached Biden's top border official Alejandro Mayorkas
Send a link to a friend
[April 08, 2024]
By Ted Hesson
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Republican-controlled U.S. House of
Representatives this week is due to deliver its impeachment case against
President Joe Biden's top border official, Homeland Security Secretary
Alejandro Mayorkas, to the Democratic-majority Senate.
That chamber's majority Democrats are seen as all but certain to bring
the proceedings to a swift end, arguing that Republicans have fallen
short of the "high crimes and misdemeanors" standard that impeachment
calls for.
WHY DID HOUSE REPUBLICANS IMPEACH MAYORKAS?
Republicans accuse Biden and Mayorkas of failing to sufficiently deter
illegal immigration across the U.S.-Mexico border, which has reached
record levels since the Democratic president took office in 2021.
Republicans argue that Mayorkas refused to fully enforce U.S.
immigration laws and should not have reversed restrictive policies put
in place by Republican former President Donald Trump, Biden's leading
rival in the Nov. 5 election.
Republicans also contend Mayorkas exceeded his authority by allowing
hundreds of thousands of migrants to enter legally through emergency
"parole" programs.
The U.S. Border Patrol made more than 1 million arrests of migrants
crossing the U.S.-Mexico border illegally in the past six months,
according to internal agency statistics reviewed by Reuters, a pace
similar to record-breaking totals during Biden's first three years in
office.
During Trump's 2017-2021 presidency, migrant arrests peaked at 852,000
in fiscal year 2019.
Reuters/Ipsos polling shows that immigration is the top concern for
Republicans and the party has used the issue to motivate their base.
HOW HAVE DEMOCRATS RESPONDED TO REPUBLICAN ATTACKS?
The Biden administration says it has created a more orderly and humane
immigration system and that record levels of migration are challenging
countries throughout the Western Hemisphere.
In recent months, Biden has toughened his border rhetoric and tried to
shift blame to Republicans for high levels of illegal crossings.
Specifically, the president has faulted Republicans for declining to
provide more funding for border enforcement and for rejecting a
bipartisan border deal in the Senate that would have given Biden a
sweeping authority to send migrants caught at the southwest border back
to Mexico. Trump voiced loud objections to the bill, dooming its chances
in the House.
Mayorkas - a former federal prosecutor - defended his immigration
enforcement record and commitment to government service in a January
letter to House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mark Green.
Representative Bennie Thompson, the top Democrat on the homeland
committee, has dismissed the impeachment proceedings as a politically
motivated "sham."
ARE THERE GROUNDS FOR IMPEACHMENT?
Several constitutional experts have said the allegations against
Mayorkas raised by Republicans do not meet the high bar for impeachment
outlined in the U.S. Constitution.
The only Cabinet member ever to be impeached by the House was former
President Ulysses S. Grant's secretary of war, William Belknap in 1876
following allegations of corruption. He was acquitted by the Senate.
[to top of second column]
|
Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas arrives to
participate in U.S. President Joe Biden's meeting with U.S.
governors attending the National Governors Association winter
meeting, in the East Room of the White House in Washington, U.S.,
February 23, 2024. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz/File Photo
Frank Bowman, a University of Missouri law school professor and
impeachment expert, said at a January hearing that Republicans had
not provided evidence that Mayorkas had committed potentially
impeachable actions such as corruption, abuse of power or subversion
of the U.S. Constitution.
"Whatever may be the grounds for impeachment and removal, dislike of
a president's policy is certainly not one of them," Bowman said,
quoting the late constitutional scholar Charles Black.
Other scholars have raised concerns that Republicans have weaponized
impeachment for political gain, setting a dangerous precedent for
the divided U.S. government. Hardline Republican Representative
Marjorie Taylor Greene began to push for Biden's impeachment
immediately after he took office in January 2021, a move that
observers described as revenge for House Democrats twice impeaching
Trump, a historic first. Both times Trump was acquitted by the
Senate.
Republicans also have launched an inquiry into whether Biden
improperly benefited from his son Hunter Biden's foreign business
dealings.
WHAT WILL HAPPEN IN THE SENATE?
The Republican-controlled House impeached Mayorkas on its second
attempt on Feb. 13, with a 214-213 vote that fell almost entirely
along party lines. The impeachment followed a failed vote a week
earlier.
Mayorkas is unlikely to be convicted of the charges in the Senate,
where Democrats hold a 51-49 majority.
WHAT DO REPUBLICANS WANT AT THE BORDER?
Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson has said Biden needs to
reinstate Trump policies and crack down on border crossings.
Johnson also has called on the Senate to approve a bill passed by
the House in May 2023 that would effectively end access to asylum at
the border.
The measure, known as H.R. 2, passed with broad Republican support
but with no backing from Democrats.
The bill has not come to a vote in the Senate, where it would face
steep Democratic opposition. Even if it passed the Senate, the White
House has said Biden would veto it.
The bill generally bars migrants from seeking U.S. asylum at the
border if they passed through another country en route to the United
States, one of several provisions that would greatly reduce such
claims for protection.
The legislation grants the U.S. homeland security secretary sweeping
authority to suspend entry to migrants to maintain "operational
control" of the border, a standard defined as prevention of all
illegal entries.
Johnson rejected the bipartisan bill brokered in the Senate, saying
it would not adequately reduce illegal crossings and would be "dead
on arrival" in the House.
(Reporting by Ted Hesson in Washington; Editing by Scott Malone and
Alistair Bell)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.]This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |