WHY IT'S IMPORTANT
The Supreme Court in late 2023 announced its first formal code
of conduct governing the ethical behavior of its justices,
following months of outside pressure over revelations of their
undisclosed luxury trips and hobnobbing with wealthy
benefactors.
The Judiciary Committee in November voted to authorize subpoenas
for Leo, a legal activist and co-chair of the Federalist Society
who was instrumental in compiling Republican former President
Donald Trump's list of potential Supreme Court nominees, and for
Harlan Crow, a billionaire Republican donor and benefactor of
conservative Justice Clarence Thomas.
Republican senators walked out of that contentious committee
meeting in protest while Democrats cast votes. Some Republicans
also questioned the vote's legitimacy, accusing Democrats of
violating procedural rules.
KEY QUOTES
"Since July 2023, Leonard Leo has responded to the legitimate
oversight requests of the Senate Judiciary Committee with a
blanket refusal to cooperate. His outright defiance left the
Committee with no other choice but to move forward with
compulsory process," Dick Durbin, chair of the Senate Judiciary
Committee, said in an emailed statement on issuing the subpoena
to Leo.
Durbin said Leo "played a central role in the ethics crisis
plaguing the Supreme Court" and "has done nothing but stonewall
the Committee."
In an emailed statement, Leo called the subpoena "unlawful and
politically motivated" and said he will not be "capitulating" to
it. In a letter to Durbin, Leo's lawyer also said he will not
comply with the subpoena.
Taylor Reidy, a spokesperson for the committee's Republican
minority, said the subpoena was "invalid."
CONTEXT
If the subpoena recipient fails to comply, Democrats would need
60 votes in the 100-seat Senate to initiate a civil enforcement
action, meaning they would need the support of some Republicans
in the chamber where Democrats hold a narrow majority.
The Democrats also would have the option to make a referral to
the U.S. Justice Department, which could choose to pursue
criminal contempt proceedings against the subpoena recipients.
(Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Washington and Nate Raymond in
Boston; Editing by Leslie Adler)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2022 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may
not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|