Alzheimer's drug adoption in US slowed by doctors' skepticism
Send a link to a friend
[April 23, 2024]
By Julie Steenhuysen
CHICAGO (Reuters) -Nine months into the U.S. launch of the first drug
proven to slow the advance of Alzheimer's, Eisai and Biogen's Leqembi is
facing an unexpected hurdle to widespread use: an entrenched belief
among some doctors that treating the memory-robbing disease is futile.
Alzheimer's experts had anticipated bottlenecks due to Leqembi's
requirements, which include additional diagnostic tests, twice-monthly
infusions and regular brain scans to guard against potentially lethal
side effects.
And those issues have played a role in slow adoption since the drug was
approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, according to
interviews with 20 neurologists and geriatricians from rural, urban,
academic and community practices in 19 states.
In interviews with Reuters, seven doctors treating patients for
Alzheimer's attributed their own reluctance to prescribe Leqembi to
concerns about the drug's efficacy, cost and risks.
"I don't think it's a good Alzheimer's drug. I think that's the
problem," said Dr. James Burke, a neurologist at the Ohio State
University who has been an outspoken critic of Leqembi. "It's certainly
nothing like the home run that we're looking for."
Another six scientists, all leaders in the field, said "therapeutic
nihilism" – the belief that Alzheimer's is a hopelessly intractable
disease – was playing a bigger role than anticipated in suppressing
demand from primary care doctors, geriatricians and neurologists who
could be sending patients to memory specialists for treatment.
Dr. Reisa Sperling, a neurologist and Alzheimer's researcher at Mass
General Brigham in Boston, likens some doctors' skepticism to Leqembi to
fatalistic attitudes about cancer treatment 30 years ago: "You can't
really do anything about it, so why would you even want to get tested?"
Alex Scott, Eisai's chief administrative officer, acknowledged that
skepticism has weighed on the launch along with slower-than-expected
adoption by large health systems.
He suggested that some of the doctors' hesitancy could be a holdover
from the decades-long journey to prove that removing the Alzheimer's
protein beta amyloid from the brain could slow the course of the
disease. Before Esai released the promising results of its Leqembi
trial, some thought that area of research "a fool's errand," Scott said.
"We are beginning to make more and more progress every single month. So
we're still quite encouraged," Scott said. "This is a new journey, and I
think it takes some time for providers to figure it out."
'SIGNIFICANT RISKS, MARGINAL BENEFIT'
Leqembi was the first amyloid-targeting drug granted full FDA approval
after it slowed the decline in cognition in people in the early stages
of Alzheimer's by 27% in a clinical trial.
Of the 10,000 Americans the companies hoped to treat by the end of
March, Eisai announced only a couple thousand had begun treatment as of
the end of January. An Eisai spokeswoman declined to provide updated
numbers.
Even for treatments that do not require dramatic changes to medical
practice, adoption of new drugs is notoriously slow. Several studies
have estimated that it can take 17 years on average for clinical
research to be translated into routine practice.
The disease is estimated to affect more than 6 million Americans,
according to the Alzheimer's Association.
Fewer than half of U.S. neurologists recommend Leqembi to patients,
according to a January survey by life sciences market researcher Spherix
Global Insights.
Dr. Michael Greicius, a professor at Stanford University's Center for
Memory Disorders, said there is little evidence that Leqembi benefits
patients in a meaningful way.
"If we take the trial result at face value, the differences between
placebo and treatment are likely small enough as to be undetectable by
patients and family members or physicians," said Greicius, who does not
recommend Leqembi to patients.
He said the long wait for an Alzheimer's drug has put doctors in the
position of feeling obligated to offer a treatment "even if the evidence
for it is very slim."
Other doctors have raised concerns about the risk of brain swelling and
bleeding associated with Leqembi as well as the costs associated with
the $26,500 annual drug, frequent MRIs and twice-monthly infusions.
"There are significant risks associated with these drugs, there are
significant costs, and I would say there is marginal benefit," said Dr.
Eric Widera, a geriatrician and professor at University of California
San Francisco, referring to amyloid-lowering treatments.
In an editorial published in November in the Journal of Gerontological
Nursing, Donna Fick, president of the American Geriatrics Society,
advised doctors that the group recommends caution in the use of
lecanemab, which is sold under the brand name of Leqembi.
[to top of second column]
|
Lyn Castellano receives infusions of Eisai and Biogen's Alzheimer's
drug Leqembi, alongside her service dog Jazmin at the Missouri
Baptist Medical Center Infusion Center in St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.
October 16, 2023. Joe Castellano/Handout via REUTERS
"It is not yet clear whether
treatments such as lecanemab that remove amyloid from the brain
produce clinically important slowing of cognitive decline in
Alzheimer's disease."
'YOUR ENEMY IS NIHILISM'
Dr. Jonathan Liss, a neurologist from Columbus, Georgia, who serves
on Eisai's scientific advisory board and has tested Leqembi in
clinical trials, said he first warned about nihilism at a November
2022 conference following a presentation of Leqembi's breakthrough
study.
Eisai had asked its scientific advisors how the drug might fare
against future rivals. Liss cautioned that rivals were not the
enemy; "your enemy is nihilism,'" he recalled. "All of the
neurologists around the table started applauding."
Dr. Nathaniel Chin, a geriatrician with the University of
Wisconsin's Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, said he was the
target of negative comments on social media after he urged
geriatricians to embrace such treatments in the Journal of the
American Geriatrics Society.
Geriatricians, geriatric social workers and nurses objected, arguing
that the drug's statistically significant benefit was not clinically
meaningful to patients, especially given the risks, he said.
"I would ask the question, 'Is it ethical to withhold a medication
that is FDA-approved and covered by insurance from someone who knows
the risk and is willing to take it?'" Chin said.
Dr. Priya Singhal, executive vice president and head of development
at Biogen, acknowledged some apathy among physicians about the
treatment but said that infrastructure and lack of access to
neurologists have been bigger issues.
Singhal said the companies are working with physician and patient
advocacy groups and developing educational programs and materials
aimed at diagnosing early-stage patients, managing side effects and
understanding the drug's benefits.
The companies said they intend to increase their salesforce by 30%
as they aim for 100,000 patients by 2026.
For the moment, Leqembi is the only Alzheimer's drug on the market
designed to slow the course of the disease. A decision on Lilly's
donanemab has been delayed until the FDA convenes an advisory panel.
Lilly neuroscience president Anne White said in an interview that
she sees doctor hesitancy as an issue that the company hopes to
address by making clear which patients benefit from such treatments.
In the early stages of Alzheimer's, many patients are still
independent, and to be able to remain so for longer is very
meaningful, she said.
'PEACE AND QUIET'
Lyn Castellano, 64, who founded and ran a St. Louis breast cancer
charity for 20 years and trained therapy dogs, started taking
Leqembi last September, nearly a year after she found herself
struggling with keeping track of appointments and was diagnosed with
mild cognitive impairment.
Castellano said the prospect of bleeding in the brain – a possible
side effect of the drug - was her biggest concern, but her family
believed the drug may offer a chance at slowing the disease.
She is one of more than 140 patients being treated by physicians
from Washington University in St. Louis, and has had 13 infusions
and two MRIs without incident.
Dr. Suzanne Schindler, an Alzheimer's researcher who is treating
Castellano, said Leqembi "forces clinicians to completely change the
way they have practiced medicine for many years."
She said she is candid about Leqembi's modest benefit as well as the
risks. About 80% of those she believes are good candidates have
opted for the treatment, she said.
While Castellano can't tell if Leqembi is helping, she says the
treatment has given her hope, and she doesn't mind the twice monthly
infusions.
"I get to go, sit back in a nice chair, have my dog with me and read
a book for a couple hours. It's about the only place I get some
peace and quiet."
(Reporting by Julie Steenhuysen in Chicago; editing by Caroline
Humer and Suzanne Goldenberg)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|