Republican-controlled Georgia election board passes rule that may delay
vote certification
Send a link to a friend
[August 20, 2024]
By Joseph Ax
(Reuters) - Georgia's Republican-controlled state election board
approved a new rule on Monday that voting rights advocates say could
permit local election officials to delay certification of November's
presidential election results, potentially throwing the outcome of the
battleground state's vote into uncertainty.
The five-member board, which includes three conservative members
championed by Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, voted 3-2
to empower county election board members to investigate any
discrepancies, even minor ones, between the number of cast ballots and
the number of voters in each precinct before certification.
Such mismatches are not uncommon and are not typically evidence of
fraud, according to voting rights advocates, who say the rule could
permit individual board members to intentionally delay approval of the
results.
Trump, who praised the majority's three members by name during a Georgia
campaign rally earlier this month, has falsely claimed for years that
the 2020 election was rigged by fraud.
His infamous January 2021 phone call in which he asked the state's top
election official, Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, to
"find" enough votes to sway the outcome helped lead to Trump's pending
indictment on state charges.
Voter fraud in the U.S. is vanishingly rare, research shows.
Trump faces Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential
candidate, in the Nov. 5 election. Polls show a close race, with Georgia
among seven states likely to determine the outcome.
Monday's action came less than two weeks after the board's majority
approved a separate rule that county election boards conduct a
"reasonable inquiry" into any irregularities before certifying the
results. The rule did not define "reasonable" or set a particular
deadline for completing the inquiry.
Voting rights groups say the new rules could allow election deniers to
refuse to certify any election that their preferred candidate lost.
"These rules are potentially granting individual county board members
the power to obstruct, delay or otherwise interfere with the
certification process," said Nikhel Sus, an attorney with the nonprofit
watchdog Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington.
[to top of second column]
|
Fulton County residents vote during the Georgia primary on Election
Day at the Metropolitan Library in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., May 21,
2024. REUTERS/Alyssa Pointer/File Photo
Even if certification proceeds, he said, any doubt cast on the
results could be used as a pretext to argue that Congress should
ignore them, as some Trump allies argued in 2020.
Republican supporters said it would simply ensure that election
results were accurate.
"This is a matter of good government, not politics," Hans von
Spovosky, an election law scholar at the conservative Heritage
Foundation, said during the election board's hearing. "Those who say
this will disenfranchise voters – that's just not true."
Before Trump's loss in 2020, certification was essentially a rubber
stamp. But at least 19 election board members across nine counties
in Georgia have objected to certifying election results since 2020,
according to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution newspaper.
Local election officials in several other states, including such
battlegrounds as Arizona and Michigan, have also voted against
certifying results.
The board also advanced on Monday a rule that would require a hand
count of ballots in every precinct after the polls close. The board
will consider that proposal in September.
Raffensperger issued a statement last week opposing the actions by
the board's "unelected bureaucrats," warning that the "11th-hour"
changes would undermine voter confidence and burden election
workers.
(Reporting by Joseph Ax; editing by Paul Thomasch and Deepa
Babington)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|