Fed minutes to show depth of debate over a July rate cut
Send a link to a friend
[August 21, 2024] By
Michael S. Derby and Dan Burns
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - While the focus is now on September for the start
of Federal Reserve interest rate cuts, at least some U.S. central
bankers were keen to get the debate about it rolling at last month's
policy meeting.
Roughly how many were in that camp and how unified the remaining
policymakers were in seeing the Fed's Sept. 17-18 meeting as a preferred
starting point for reducing borrowing costs should become clear when the
minutes of the July 30-31 meeting are released on Wednesday.
The central bank's policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee ended
that meeting by leaving its benchmark overnight borrowing rate in the
5.25%-5.50% range where it has been since July 2023, but officials
agreed to a number of key policy statement changes that opened the door
to a rate cut at their gathering next month.
That expectation was further solidified by Fed Chair Jerome Powell's
remarks in his post-meeting press conference, when he said: "If we were
to see inflation moving down ... more or less in line with expectations,
growth remains reasonably strong, and the labor market remains
consistent with current conditions, then I think a rate cut could be on
the table at the September meeting."
Two days after the meeting, the Labor Department reported a sharp
slowdown in payrolls growth in July, with the unemployment rate rising
to a post-pandemic high of 4.3%.
In addition to unleashing a bout of financial market volatility that
briefly reflected a small chance of the Fed rushing to cut rates prior
to its next scheduled meeting, the indication of job market softening
brought forth a number of Fed officials themselves to indicate they
would be ready to consider rate cuts come September.
"The balance of risks has shifted, so the debate about potentially
cutting rates in September is an appropriate one to have," Minneapolis
Fed President Neel Kashkari said in an interview with the Wall Street
Journal that was emblematic of the shift among policymakers. Until now
Kashkari had emphasized the importance of ensuring inflation returns to
the Fed's 2% target, even if that meant leaving rates where they are
until near the end of this year.
[to top of second column] |
A jogger runs past the Federal Reserve building in Washington, DC,
U.S., August 22, 2018. REUTERS/Chris Wattie/File Photo
CLUES
Officials last month agreed to several key changes to their policy
statement, softening the description of inflation and saying the
risks to employment were now on a par with those of rising prices -
neutral language that sets the stage for rates to fall after more
than two years of tightening credit.
But Powell, speaking in his post-meeting press conference, also said
some officials "examined the possibility" of the case for cutting
rates right then. Still, he said, "overwhelmingly, the sense of the
Committee was not at this meeting but as soon as the next meeting,
depending on how the data come in."
Just how that discussion is reflected in the minutes on Wednesday is
key and could be a guide to the scope and pace of what now appears
to be an imminent shift to policy easing. Interest rate futures
markets reflect a 100% probability of a rate cut next month - with
the only difference of opinion around the size: A quarter of a
percentage point or half a percentage point. The probability
currently favors the smaller cut.
"The debate on pulling easing into July (or easing by more than 25
basis points in September) will be scrutinized closely to gauge the
amount of support and, more crucially, the sensitivity of the pace,
including September cut size, to the labor market moderation,"
analysts at LH Meyer/Monetary Policy Analytics wrote. "Now that the
debate on September is more the size of cut, less whether or not,
forward guidance on easing onset might be conveyed in wording like
'before long.'"
(Reporting by Dan Burns; Additional reporting by Howard Schneider;
Editing by Paul Simao)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|