US judge strikes down Biden administration ban on worker 'noncompete'
agreements
Send a link to a friend
[August 21, 2024]
By Daniel Wiessner
(Reuters) -A federal judge in Texas on Tuesday barred a U.S. Federal
Trade Commission rule from taking effect that would ban agreements
commonly signed by workers not to join their employers' rivals or launch
competing businesses.
U.S. District Judge Ada Brown in Dallas said the FTC, which enforces
federal antitrust laws, does not have the authority to ban practices it
deems unfair methods of competition by adopting broad rules.
Brown had temporarily blocked the rule in July while she considered a
bid by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the country's largest business
lobby, and tax service firm Ryan to strike it down entirely. The rule
was set to take effect Sept. 4.
Brown in her ruling said that even if the FTC had the power to adopt the
rule, the agency had not justified banning virtually all noncompete
agreements.
"The Commission’s lack of evidence as to why they chose to impose such a
sweeping prohibition ... instead of targeting specific, harmful
non-competes, renders the Rule arbitrary and capricious," wrote Brown,
an appointee of Republican former President Donald Trump.
FTC spokesperson Victoria Graham said the agency was disappointed with
the ruling and is "seriously considering a potential appeal."
"Today's decision does not prevent the FTC from addressing noncompetes
through case-by-base enforcement actions," Graham said in a statement.
The Chamber of Commerce did not immediately respond to a request for
comment.
[to top of second column]
|
Signage is seen at the Federal Trade Commission headquarters in
Washington, D.C., U.S., August 29, 2020. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File
Photo
The Democratic-controlled FTC approved the ban on noncompete
agreements in a 3-2 vote in May. The commission and supporters of
the rule say the agreements are an unfair restraint on competition
that violate U.S. antitrust law and suppress workers' wages and
mobility.
About 30 million people, or 20% of U.S. workers, have signed
noncompetes, according to the FTC.
The commission often adopts rules that target specific industries,
such as requiring telemarketers to make certain disclosures or
mandating that gas stations display fuel ratings, but it is unusual
for the agency to enact bans on more widespread business practices.
Business groups have argued that Congress never intended to give the
FTC those broad powers, and that banning noncompetes will make it
difficult to safeguard trade secrets and other confidential
information.
Last week, a federal judge in Florida ruled that the ban was likely
invalid and blocked it from being applied to a real estate
developer. But a judge in Philadelphia went the other way in July,
finding that the FTC reasonably concluded that noncompetes are
virtually never justified.
(Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York; Editing by Alexia
Garamfalvi and Stephen Coates)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |