US Supreme Court partly revives Arizona's proof of citizenship voter law
Send a link to a friend
[August 23, 2024]
By John Kruzel
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday revived part of
an Arizona voter law requiring documented proof of U.S. citizenship to
register to vote, in response to a request from the Republican National
Committee and Arizona Republicans.
The justices in a 5-4 ruling agreed to reinstate a provision of the law
after a federal judge blocked it in response to legal challenges by
Democratic President Joe Biden's administration and advocacy groups.
The decision comes before the Nov. 5 election in which Democratic Vice
President Kamala Harris is facing off against Republican former
President Donald Trump, who continues to falsely claim that his 2020
election defeat was the result of fraud.
Arizona's Republican-controlled legislature adopted new restrictions on
voter registration in 2022. The law requires applicants who submit a
federal registration form to provide evidence of U.S. citizenship to
vote in presidential elections or vote by mail in any federal election.
Voter registrants who use a separate, state-created form face even
tighter restrictions. Without proof of U.S. citizenship, state
applications are rejected in their entirety, and officials who fail to
do so face a minor felony charge under the law.
The Supreme Court's ruling revived the restriction related to the state
voter registration form, but kept intact a judicial decision blocking
the provision that sought to tighten limits on the federal form.
Chief Justice John Roberts joined with fellow conservative Justices
Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch to grant
Republicans' request in part, though Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch indicated
they would have granted the entire request.
Liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson,
along with conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, would have denied the
request in full.
When Republican then-Governor Doug Ducey signed the legislation in March
2022, he said the measure balanced voting accessibility with election
security.
"Election integrity means counting every lawful vote and prohibiting any
attempt to illegally cast a vote," Ducey said.
The Biden administration sued to block the Arizona law in July 2022,
claiming it is superseded by a 1993 federal law called the National
Voter Registration Act. The law says that states must register voters
for federal elections after they submit the federal registration form,
which requires a declaration of U.S. citizenship under penalty of
perjury, but not documentary proof.
A separate legal challenge argued that the Arizona law violated a 2018
court-approved settlement requiring state election officials to register
voters who lack documented proof of U.S. citizenship for federal
elections, regardless of whether they use the federal or state form.
[to top of second column]
|
A "vote here/aqui" sign is set up at Burton Barr Central Library in
Phoenix, Arizona, U.S., July 30, 2024. REUTERS/Caitlin O'Hara/File
Photo
The Republican National Committee and Arizona's top Republican
lawmakers intervened to defend the law.
Phoenix-based U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton in September 2023
sided with the Biden administration and other plaintiffs in their
challenge to Arizona's proof of citizenship requirements. She
blocked the state from barring federal-form applicants from voting
for president or voting by mail, or rejecting state-form
applications, for lacking citizenship documentation.
A three-judge panel on the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals that reviewed the case on its merits declined to
halt Bolton's ruling. This prompted an emergency Supreme Court
filing from the Republican National Committee and Arizona
Republicans.
Arizona's attorney general and secretary of state, both Democrats,
opposed the Republicans' request to the justices.
Arizona, which is expected to be one of the most competitive states
in the November election, has been a flashpoint in the U.S. battle
over voting rights.
A widely criticized Republican review of the 2020 presidential
election found no evidence that irregularities marred Biden's narrow
victory over Trump.
Arizona enacted a law in 2005 requiring new voters to provide proof
of citizenship, but the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2013 that the
state could not impose that requirement on those who used a federal
form to register. Since then, the state has allowed those voters to
participate only in federal elections, not state or local races.
Arizona had more than 42,000 "federal only" registered voters as of
July 1, according to state data.
The Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives earlier this
year passed a similar bill requiring proof of citizenship to
register to vote in elections, but it went nowhere in the
Democratic-majority U.S. Senate.
(Reporting by John Kruzel; editing by Jonathan Oatis)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|