No ‘slated’ GOP candidates will be kept off ballot after rulings from
Supreme Court, elections board
Send a link to a friend
[August 24, 2024]
By JERRY NOWICKI
& JENNIFER FULLER
Capitol News Illinois
news@capitolnewsillinois.com
SPRINGFIELD – A law banning political parties from waiting until after
the primary election to place a state legislative candidate on the
general election ballot won’t keep any Republicans from running this
November.
The Illinois Supreme Court and State Board of Elections each made
rulings Friday ensuring that a law rushed through by Democrats in May
wouldn’t throw a wrench into the filing process for the current election
cycle.
The decisions pertain to “candidate slating,” a process through which
party insiders can name a candidate to the general election ballot for
their party, even if no candidate ran in the party’s primary. The law –
which is now officially on hold for 2024 – still allows parties to
replace withdrawals but prevents slating in cases where the party didn’t
run anyone in the primary.
The elections board ruled Friday morning that slated Republican
candidate Jay Keeven may appear on the November ballot, throwing out
challenges against him and other candidates that would have been
affected by the law.
Hours later, the high court issued what’s known as a “Perlman order,”
affirming a lower court’s decision to temporarily halt the law for the
current cycle without setting a precedent in future cases. That ruling
doesn’t void the law in its entirety, but rather blocks it only for this
year’s general election for the 14 plaintiffs – all slated Republican
candidates – that sued the state after the law’s passage.
Democrats introduced the bill in May, then passed it and sent it to the
governor for a signature within 48 hours.
While Democrats billed the law as one to would weaken “party bosses,”
Republicans decried it as a majority-party power grab to keep
Republicans off the ballot in tight races.
A Sangamon County judge agreed in a June ruling that Democrats were out
of line in changing the rules mid-cycle. Judge Gail Noll blocked the law
from taking effect against the candidates who sued the state following
its passage. The Supreme Court’s Friday opinion – which noted two
justices recused themselves and the remaining judges couldn’t come to a
four-vote majority – upholds the order.
Keeven, a candidate in what’s expected to be a tight House race against
incumbent Democrat Katie Stuart in the Metro East, was not party to the
lawsuit, because he filed petitions before the law took effect.
Democrats challenged his candidacy, seeking to use the law to remove him
from the ballot.
The Illinois State Board of Elections rejected the challenge on Friday
on the grounds that “he filed his nomination papers in an accordance
with the law in effect at the time.” They accepted the recommendation of
a hearing officer with one dissenting vote from Board Chair Casandra
Watson.
“For months, Democrats in Springfield have tried every possible way to
keep the voters in the Metro-East from having a choice in November,”
Keeven said in a statement. “Today, they lost. With every attempt to
kick me off of the ballot, our campaign continues to gain momentum.”
Keeven’s challengers were represented by Michael Kasper, a Democratic
election lawyer who has long been a power player on issues such as
redistricting and candidate challenges. He argued that the hearing
officer erred by enforcing a law that was no longer on the books.
“The board's powers are to apply the law as it is today,” he argued.
But John Fogarty, the GOP’s counterpart to Kasper, argued the General
Assembly shouldn’t be allowed to change the rules in the middle of an
election cycle, particularly for candidates for the General Assembly.
[to top of second column]
|
The Illinois Supreme Court is pictured in Springfield. (Capitol News
Illinois file photo)
“The role of this body is, yes, to apply the law, but you also apply the
law as it was when this act was taken,” he said, noting that if the
General Assembly wanted the law applied retroactively, it could have
specifically said so.
Presidential action
In other action, the board removed two third-party candidates from the
presidential ballot while ruling that independent candidate Robert F.
Kennedy Jr. can remain on the ballot despite objections.
Libertarian candidate Scott Schluter and Green Party candidate Jill
Stein were both ordered removed due to lack of signatures.
The challenges to Kennedy’s candidacy stemmed largely on the argument
that he falsified his address, among other challenges to signatures and
nominating petitions. But a hearing officer recommended he be kept on
the ballot and the board agreed.
Kennedy’s lawyer didn’t comment when asked about the candidate’s future
in the race.
“Is your client dropping out?” Watson asked.
“That’s beyond my pay grade. I'm sorry, I don't know,” Kennedy’s
attorney Andrew Finko replied. “I'm here for the electoral board and
that's it.”
Hours later, Kennedy said he’s not terminating his campaign but is
taking his name off the ballot in swing states as to not play “spoiler.”
He’s endorsing former President Donald Trump over Vice President Kamala
Harris.
The Illinois State Board of Elections confirmed Friday Kennedy’s name
would appear on the ballot and he had not filed to withdraw as of
Friday.
Bost elections case denied
A federal appeals court this week rejected a lawsuit from U.S. Rep. Mike
Bost, R-Murphysboro, that argued Illinois’ policy of accepting mail-in
ballots for two weeks after election day violates federal law.
In its 2-1 decision, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals panel agreed with
a circuit court that Bost and other plaintiffs in the case lacked
standing, because they didn’t have evidence that they were tangibly
harmed by the law.
Illinois allows mail-in ballots to be counted up to 14 days after
Election Day, as long as they are postmarked by Election Day. Bost and
other plaintiffs argued their votes would be diluted, and that
candidates would have to spend more money, in part by maintaining
campaign offices for longer periods.
Writing for the majority, Judge John Lee said Bost’s claims failed to
show voters were harmed by ballots being counted after Election Day.
“Even if we were to accept Plaintiffs’ premise that inclusion of these
ballots would cause vote dilution, their votes would be diluted in the
same way that every other vote cast in Illinois prior to Election Day
would be diluted,” Lee wrote. “Thus, to the extent Plaintiffs would
suffer any injury, it would be in a generalized manner and not “personal
and individual” to Plaintiffs, as the Supreme Court requires.”
U.S. District Judge John Kness dismissed the case last year. Bost
appealed, and that appeal was heard nine days after the 2024 primary he
narrowly won over challenger and former state Sen. Darren Bailey,
R-Xenia.
Judge Michael Scudder Jr. agreed the votes would not be unfairly
diluted, but he disagreed with the other two judges on Bost’s standing
in the suit. Rather, Scudder classified Bost as an “active stakeholder.”
Capitol News Illinois is
a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service covering state government. It is
distributed to hundreds of newspapers, radio and TV stations statewide.
It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert
R. McCormick Foundation, along with major contributions from the
Illinois Broadcasters Foundation and Southern Illinois Editorial
Association. |