In a complaint on Friday, Ruby Freeman and her daughter Wandrea'
"Shaye" Moss challenged Giuliani's July 13 declaration that the
Palm Beach condominium was his new primary residence.
They called it a "brazen" attempt by the former New York City
mayor to benefit from a Florida law shielding a person's
"homestead" from court judgments.
Giuliani made the declaration one day after a federal judge
dismissed his bankruptcy case, which had protected him from the
$148 million judgment.
Citing statements on his daily internet broadcasts, Freeman and
Moss said Giuliani has since lived mainly or entirely elsewhere,
and is only pretending to live in Florida to evade
accountability for his actions.
"He is trying to 'toy with' Florida's homestead exemption to
shield a multi-million dollar asset from his creditors," they
said in their complaint filed in Manhattan federal court.
Freeman and Moss want court permission to enforce an Aug. 8 lien
against Giuliani's condominium and, if they choose, seize and
sell the property. Giuliani also has a home in Manhattan.
"The appeal of the objectively unreasonable $148 million verdict
hasn't even been heard, yet opposing counsel continues to take
steps designed to harass and intimidate the mayor," Giuliani's
spokesman Ted Goodman said in an email.
"This lawsuit has always been designed to censor and bully the
mayor, and to deter others from exercising their right to speak
up and to speak out," Goodman added.
Last December, a Washington jury ordered Giuliani to pay the
$148 million to Freeman and Moss, who said he defamed them and
destroyed their reputation through lies that they tried to help
steal the 2020 U.S. presidential election from Trump.
Giuliani, 80, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy the following
week. The federal judge overseeing that case dismissed it after
finding that Giuliani failed to provide a complete picture of
his finances and to meet court deadlines.
That dismissal, which Giuliani also sought, eliminated the
possibility a trustee could take over his finances and freed him
to appeal the $148 million judgment, but also removed legal
protections from creditors like Freeman and Moss.
The case is Freeman et al v. Giuliani, U.S. District Court,
Southern District of New York, No. 24-06563.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; editing by Jonathan
Oatis)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All
rights reserved.]
Copyright 2022 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may
not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|