House approves $895B defense bill with military pay raise, ban on
transgender care for minors
Send a link to a friend
[December 12, 2024]
By KEVIN FREKING
WASHINGTON (AP) — The House on Wednesday passed a $895 billion measure
that authorizes a 1% increase in defense spending this fiscal year and
would give a double-digit pay raise to about half of the enlisted
service members in the military.
The bill is traditionally strongly bipartisan, but some Democratic
lawmakers opposed the inclusion of a ban on transgender medical
treatments for children of military members if such treatment could
result in sterilization.
The bill passed the House by a vote of 281-140 and will next move to the
Senate, where lawmakers had sought a bigger boost in defense spending
than the current measure allows.
Lawmakers are touting the bill's 14.5% pay raise for junior enlisted
service members and a 4.5% increase for others as key to improving the
quality of life for those serving in the U.S. military. Those serving as
junior enlisted personnel are in pay grades that generally track with
their first enlistment term.
Lawmakers said service member pay has failed to remain competitive with
the private sector, forcing many military families to rely on food banks
and government assistance programs to put food on the table. The bill
also provides significant new resources for child care and housing.
“No service member should have to live in squalid conditions and no
military family should have to rely on food stamps to feed their
children, but that's exactly what many of our service members are
experiencing, especially the junior enlisted,” said Rep. Mike Rogers,
R-Ala., chairman of the House Armed Services Committee. “This bill goes
a long way to fixing that.”
The bill sets key Pentagon policy that lawmakers will attempt to fund
through a follow-up appropriations bill. The overall spending tracks the
numbers established in a 2023 agreement that then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy
reached with President Joe Biden to increase the nation’s borrowing
authority and avoid a federal default in exchange for spending
restraints. Many senators had wanted to increase defense spending some
$25 billion above what was called for in that agreement, but those
efforts failed.
Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., who is expected to serve as the next
chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said the overall
spending level was a “tremendous loss for our national defense," though
he agreed with many provisions within the bill.
“We need to make a generational investment to deter the Axis of
Aggressors. I will not cease work with my congressional colleagues, the
Trump administration, and others until we achieve it,” Wicker said.
House Republicans don't want to go above the McCarthy-Biden agreement
for defense spending and are looking to go way below it for many
non-defense programs.
They are also focused on cultural issues. The bill prohibits funding for
teaching critical race theory in the military and prohibits TRICARE
health plans from covering gender dysphoria treatment for children under
18 if that treatment could result in sterilization.
Rep. Adam Smith of Washington state, the ranking Democratic member of
the House Armed Services Committee, said minors dealing with gender
dysphoria is a "very real problem." He said the treatments available,
including puberty blockers and hormone therapy, have proven effective at
helping young people dealing with suicidal thoughts, anxiety and
depression.
“These treatments changed their lives and in many cases saved their
lives,” Smith said. “And in this bill, we decided we're going to bar
servicemembers' children from having access to that.”
[to top of second column]
|
The Department of Defense logo is seen on the wall in the Press
Briefing room at the Pentagon on Tuesday, Oct. 29, 2024 in
Washington. (AP Photo/Kevin Wolf)
Smith said the number of minors in service member families receiving
transgender medical care extends into the thousands. He could have
supported a study asking medical experts to determine whether such
treatments are too often used, but a ban on health insurance
coverage went too far. He said Speaker Mike Johnson's office
insisted upon the ban and said the provision “taints an otherwise
excellent piece of legislation.”
Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, called the ban a step in the right
direction, saying, “I think these questions need to be pulled out of
the debate of defense, so we can get back to the business of
defending the United States of America without having to deal with
social engineering debates.”
Smith said he agrees with Roy that lawmakers should be focused on
the military and not on cultural conflicts, “and yet, here it is in
this bill.”
Branden Marty, a Navy veteran who served for 13 years, said the loss
of health coverage for transgender medical treatments could prompt
some with valuable experience to leave the military, affecting
national security because “we already struggle from a recruiting and
retention standpoint.” He also said the bill could regularly force
service members into difficult choices financially.
“It will be tough for a lot of them because of out-of-pocket
expenses, especially enlisted members who we know already struggle
with food insecurity,” said Marty, the father of a transgender
teenager. “They don’t get paid very much, so they’re going to be
making a lot of choices on a day-to-day, tactical level.”
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, the House Democratic leader, said his team was
not telling Democrats how to vote on the bill.
“There's a lot of positive things in the National Defense
Authorization Act that were negotiated in a bipartisan way, and
there are some troubling provisions in a few areas as well,”
Jeffries said.
Overall, 81 Democrats ended up voting for the bill and 124 against
it. On the Republican side, 200 voted for the bill and 16 against.
“It’s disappointing to see 124 of my Democrat colleagues vote
against our brave men and women in uniform over policies that have
nothing to do with their intended mission,” Johnson said.
The defense policy bill also looks to strengthen deterrence against
China. It calls for investing $15.6 billion to build military
capabilities in the Indo-Pacific region. The Biden administration
had requested about $10 billion.
On Israel, the bill, among other things, includes an expansion of
U.S. joint military exercises with Israel and a prohibition on the
Pentagon citing casualty data from Hamas.
The defense policy bill is one of the final measures that lawmakers
view as a must-pass before making way for a new Congress in January.
All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved |