South Korea's Yoon defends martial law as an act of governance and vows
to 'fight to the end'
Send a link to a friend
[December 12, 2024]
By HYUNG-JIN KIM and KIM TONG-HYUNG
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol defended
his martial law decree as an act of governance and denied rebellion
charges, vowing Thursday to “fight to the end” in response to attempts
to impeach him and intensifying investigations into last week’s dramatic
move.
The main opposition Democratic Party quickly slammed Yoon’s speech as
“an expression of extreme delusion" and “false propaganda.” Later
Thursday, it and other opposition parties submitted a new impeachment
motion against Yoon for a floor vote this weekend.
The opposition-controlled parliament also passed motions Thursday to
impeach and suspend Yoon's police chief and justice minister over the
imposition of martial law, escalating the pressure on Yoon's embattled
government.
Yoon’s short-lived Dec. 3 martial law declaration has generated
political chaos and large protests calling for his ouster. The decree
brought hundreds of armed troops who attempted to encircle parliament
and raid the election commission, though no major violence or injuries
occurred. Martial law lasted only six hours as Yoon was forced to lift
it after the National Assembly unanimously voted it down.
In a televised speech Thursday, Yoon, a conservative, said he enacted
martial law as a warning to the liberal Democratic Party. He called the
party “a monster” and “anti-state forces” that he said tried to use its
legislative muscle to impeach top officials, undermined the government’s
budget bill for next year and sympathized with North Korea.

“I will fight to the end to prevent the forces and criminal groups that
have been responsible for paralyzing the country’s government and
disrupting the nation’s constitutional order from threatening the future
of the Republic of Korea,” Yoon said. “The opposition is now doing a
sword dance of chaos, claiming that the declaration of martial law
constitutes to an act of rebellion. But was it really?"
Yoon said martial law was an act of governance that cannot be the
subject of investigations and doesn’t amount to rebellion. He said the
deployment of nearly 300 soldiers to the National Assembly was designed
to maintain order, not dissolve or paralyze it.
Kim Min-seok, head of a Democratic Party task force, dismissed Yoon’s
statement as “an expression of extreme delusion” and “a declaration of
war against the people.” Kim accused the president of attempting to
incite pro-Yoon riots by far-right forces. He said the Democratic Party
will focus on getting the motion impeaching Yoon passed on Saturday.
It's unclear how Yoon's comments will affect his fate. Opposition
parties hold 192 seats combined, eight votes short of a two-thirds
majority of the 300 members of the National Assembly. The earlier
attempt to impeach Yoon failed with most lawmakers from Yoon’s governing
People Power Party boycotting the vote.
Yoon's speech was expected to deepen a divide inside the PPP. When party
chair Han Dong-hun, a critic of Yoon, called Yoon's statement “a
confession of rebellion” during a party meeting, Yoon loyalists angrily
jeered and called on Han to stop speaking. Han has urged party members
to vote in favor of Yoon's impeachment.
Opposition parties and even some PPP members say the martial law decree
was unconstitutional. South Korean law allows the president to declare
martial law during wartime or similar emergencies, and they said such a
situation did not exist. They argue that deploying troops to seal the
National Assembly to suspend its political activities amounted to
rebellion because the constitution doesn’t give a president such rights
in any situation.
The country's law enforcement authorities are investigating whether Yoon
and others involved in imposing martial law committed rebellion, abuse
of power and other crimes. A conviction for rebellion carries a maximum
penalty of death.
[to top of second column]
|

In this photo provided by South Korea Presidential Office, South
Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol speaks at the presidential office in
Seoul, South Korea, Thursday, Dec. 12, 2024. (South Korea
Presidential Office via AP)

The National Assembly on Thursday passed a bill that could introduce
an independent counsel to investigate Yoon on rebellion charges
without his approval. A bill it endorsed earlier this week on
appointing an independent counsel requires Yoon's approval. The
Justice Ministry on Monday placed an oversea travel ban on Yoon.
South Korean law gives a president immunity from prosecution while
in office, except for allegations of rebellion or treason. This
means that Yoon can be questioned and detained by investigative
agencies over his martial law decree, but many observers doubt that
authorities will forcefully detain him because of the potential for
clashes with his presidential security service.
On Wednesday, Yoon’s presidential security service didn't allow
police to search the presidential office.
Yoon's statement was seen as an about-face. Last Saturday, he
apologized over declaring martial law and said he wouldn't avoid
responsibility for it. He said he would leave it to his party to
chart a course through the political turmoil, “including matters
related to my term in office.”
On Wednesday, Yoon's former defense minister, Kim Yong Hyun, was
arrested on allegations of playing a key role in a rebellion and
committing abuse of power. The national police chief, Cho Ji Ho, and
the head of Seoul's metropolitan police have been detained while
their actions of sending police forces to the National Assembly are
investigated as a criminal matter.
The impeachment motion against Cho accuses him of committing
rebellion and violating other laws by deploying police forces to the
parliament after martial law was announced. The separate motion for
Justice Minister Park Sung Jae accuses him of rebellion because he
didn't question the constitutionality of Yoon's martial law decree
and didn't actively stop its enforcement.
Kim, who resigned after martial law was lifted, is one of Yoon’s
close associates. He has been accused of recommending martial law to
Yoon and sending troops to the National Assembly to block lawmakers
from voting on it. He tried to kill himself in detention, but
correctional officers stopped him and he was in stable condition,
according to the Justice Ministry.
In his speech Thursday, Yoon said he had discussed imposing martial
law only with Kim before he informed other top officials about it at
a Cabinet meeting just before its declaration.
On the night of Dec. 3, besides the National Assembly, Yoon and Kim
sent troops to the National Election Commission. That raised
speculation that he might have tried to seize computer servers at
the commission as he believed unfounded rumors that the results of
April's parliamentary elections, in which his party suffered steep
losses, were rigged.

Yoon said he asked Kim to examine the supposed vulnerabilities of
the commission's computer systems, which Yoon said was hampering the
credibility of election results. He accused the commission of
resisting a thorough inspection by Seoul’s spy agency following a
cyberattack attributed to North Korea-backed hackers last year.
If Yoon is impeached, his presidential powers would be suspended
until the Constitutional Court decides whether to remove him from
office or restore his powers. If he is dismissed, a new presidential
election would be required within 60 days.
All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved |