Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions
of people
Send a link to a friend
[December 13, 2024]
By STEPHEN GROVES
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate is pushing toward a vote on legislation
that would provide full Social Security benefits to millions of people,
setting up potential passage in the final days of the lame-duck
Congress.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said Thursday he would
begin the process for a final vote on the bill, known as the Social
Security Fairness Act, which would eliminate policies that currently
limit Social Security payouts for roughly 2.8 million people.
Schumer said the bill would “ensure Americans are not erroneously denied
their well-earned Social Security benefits simply because they chose at
some point to work in their careers in public service.”
The legislation passed the House on a bipartisan vote, and a Senate
version of the bill introduced last year gained 62 cosponsors. But the
bill still needs support from at least 60 senators to pass Congress. It
would then head to President Biden.
At least one GOP senator who signed onto similar legislation last year,
Sen. Mike Braun of Indiana, said he was still “weighing” whether to vote
for the bill next week.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48c6b/48c6bf107ecb28af3421d557cf2cf41f11265da3" alt=""
“Nothing ever gets paid for, so if it's further indebtedness, I don't
know,” he said.
Decades in the making, the bill would repeal two federal policies — the
Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset — that
broadly reduce payments to two groups of Social Security recipients:
people who also receive a pension from a job that is not covered by
Social Security and surviving spouses of Social Security recipients who
receive a government pension of their own.
The bill would add more strain on the Social Security Trust funds, which
were already estimated to be unable to pay out full benefits beginning
in 2035. It would add an estimated $195 billion to federal deficits over
10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82124/82124d08c367e5a29263ac533a3e692e2e09cf04" alt=""
The Social Security Administration office is seen in Mount
Prospect, Ill., Oct. 12, 2022.(AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh, File)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eeb6b/eeb6b28c8e6c1a4c40e4db109dd5dfc4b405eecd" alt=""
The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget also
estimates that if passed, the policy would hasten the Social
Security program's insolvency date by about half a year as well as
reduce lifetime Social Security benefits by an additional $25,000
for a typical dual-income couple retiring in 2033.
Sen. John Thune, the no. 2 Republican in leadership, acknowledged
that the policy has strong bipartisan support, but said some
Republicans also want to see it “fixed in the context of a broader
Social Security reform effort.”
Conservatives have opposed the bill, decrying its cost.
“Even for something that people consider to be a good cause, it
shows a lack of concern for the future of the country, so I think it
would be a big mistake,” said Sen. Rand Paul, a Republican from
Kentucky.
Still, other Republicans have pushed Schumer to bring it up for a
vote.
Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., said last month that the current federal
limitations “penalize families across the country who worked a
public service job for part of their career with a separate pension.
We’re talking about police officers, firefighters, teachers, and
other public employees who are punished for serving their
communities.”
He predicted the bill would pass.
All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14cc9/14cc9caa35a2c2f4458cd2d42c423bff763deee2" alt="" |