Watchdog finds FBI intelligence missteps before Jan. 6 riot, but no
undercover agents were present
Send a link to a friend
[December 13, 2024]
By ERIC TUCKER and ALANNA DURKIN RICHER
WASHINGTON (AP) — The FBI should have done more to gather intelligence
before the Capitol riot, according to a watchdog report Thursday that
also said no undercover FBI employees were on the scene on Jan. 6, 2021,
and none of the bureau’s informants was authorized to participate.
The report from the Justice Department inspector general's office knocks
down a fringe conspiracy theory advanced by some Republicans in Congress
that the FBI played a role in instigating the events that day, when
rioters determined to overturn Republican Donald Trump's 2020 election
loss to Democrat Joe Biden stormed the building in a violent clash with
police.
The review, released nearly four years after a dark chapter in history
that shook the bedrock of American democracy, was narrow in scope, but
aimed to shed light on gnawing questions that have dominated public
discourse, including whether major intelligence failures preceded the
riot and whether the FBI in some way provoked the violence. It's the
latest major investigation about a day unlike any other in U.S. history,
one that has already yielded congressional inquiries and federal and
state indictments.
The report offers a mixed assessment of the FBI's performance in the
run-up to the riot, crediting the bureau for preparing for the
possibility of violence and for trying to identify known “domestic
terrorism subjects” who planned to come to Washington that day.
But it said the FBI, in an action the now-deputy director described as a
“basic step that was missed,” failed to canvass informants across all 56
of its field offices for any relevant intelligence. That was a step, the
report concluded, “that could have helped the FBI and its law
enforcement partners with their preparations in advance of January 6.”
The report did find that 26 FBI informants were in Washington for
election-related protests on Jan. 6, including three who had been tasked
with traveling to the city to report on others who were potentially
planning to attend the day's events. But while four informants entered
the Capitol, none had been authorized to do so by the bureau or to break
the law or encourage others to do so, the report said.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09885/0988550d76d7f70aa3f64963af4fd9d407fec0b7" alt=""
Many of the 26 informants did provide the FBI with information before
the riot, but it “was no more specific than, and was consistent with,
other sources of information” the FBI had acquired from other sources.
The FBI said in a letter responding to the report that it accepts the
inspection general’s recommendation “regarding potential process
improvements for future events.”
The lengthy review was launched days after the riot as the FBI faced
questions over whether it had missed warnings signs or had adequately
disseminated intelligence it had received, including a Jan. 5, 2021,
bulletin prepared by the FBI’s Norfolk, Virginia, field office that
warned of the potential for “war” at the Capitol. The inspector general
found that the information in that bulletin was broadly shared.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bc53/3bc530aa4382af341008c8c3a01de05e52d8ec6b" alt=""
FBI Director Chris Wray, who announced this week his plans to resign
at the end of Biden’s term in January, has defended his agency’s
handling of the intelligence report. He told lawmakers in 2021 that
the report was disseminated though the joint terrorism task force,
discussed at a command post in Washington and posted on an internet
portal available to other law enforcement agencies.
“We did communicate that information in a timely fashion to the
Capitol Police and (Metropolitan Police Department) in not one, not
two, but three different ways,” Wray said at the time.
Separately, the watchdog report said the FBI’s New Orleans field
office was told by a source between November 2020 and early January
2021 that protesters were planning to station a “quick reaction
force” in northern Virginia “in order to be armed and prepared to
respond to violence that day in DC, if necessary."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43517/435172cd7fcdeef7d89c405f6055ee167b6d0ba1" alt=""
That information was shared with the FBI's Washington Field Office,
members of intelligence agencies and some federal law enforcement
agencies the day before the riot, the inspector general found. But
there was no indication the FBI told northern Virginia police about
the information, the report said. An FBI official told the inspector
general there was “nothing actionable or immediately concerning
about it."
A cache of weapons at a Virginia hotel as part of a “quick reaction
force” was a central piece of the Justice Department’s seditious
conspiracy case against Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes and other
members of the far-right extremist group.
The conspiracy theory that federal law enforcement officers
entrapped members of the mob has been spread in conservative
circles, including by some Republican lawmakers. Rep. Clay Higgins,
R-La., recently suggested on a podcast that agents pretending to be
Trump supporters were responsible for instigating the violence.
Former Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., who withdrew as Trump’s pick as
attorney general amid scrutiny over sex trafficking allegations,
sent a letter to Wray in 2021 asking how many undercover agents or
informants were at the Capitol on Jan. 6 and if they were “merely
passive informants or active instigators.”
It wasn't previously clear how many FBI informants were in the crowd
that day. Wray refused to say during a congressional hearing last
year how many of the people who entered the Capitol and surrounding
area on Jan. 6 were either FBI employees or people with whom the FBI
had made contact. But Wray said the “notion that somehow the
violence at the Capitol on January 6 was part of some operation
orchestrated by FBI sources and agents is ludicrous.”
One FBI informant testified last year at the trial of former Proud
Boys leader Enrique Tarrio about marching to the Capitol with his
fellow extremist group members, and described communicating with his
handler as the mob of Trump supporters swarmed the building. But the
informant wasn't in any of the Telegram chats the Proud Boys were
accused of using to plot violence in the days leading up to Jan. 6.
All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved |