Appeals court says Pennsylvania can siphon cash from state-chartered 
		medical malpractice insurer
		
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [December 18, 2024] 
		By MARC LEVY 
		
		HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A federal appeals court is reversing lower court 
		decisions that had blocked Pennsylvania state government from siphoning 
		cash from a state-chartered medical malpractice insurer of last resort. 
		 
		The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday against the 
		Pennsylvania Professional Liability Joint Underwriting Association, 
		saying state government created the insurer, imbued it with its power 
		and held the only interest in it. 
		 
		The state, the court said, can amend or repeal the law that created the 
		nonprofit association “as it sees fit, free from interference by federal 
		courts.” 
		 
		The decision came seven years after the association first sued the state 
		in federal court, asking a judge to block Pennsylvania's threat to shut 
		it down if it didn’t hand over at least $200 million from its reserves. 
		 
		The association, created by the state in 1975 amid a medical malpractice 
		crisis, provides coverage to hundreds of health care providers, and 
		reported a $342 million surplus last Dec. 31. 
		
		It can ask the appeals court for a rehearing or appeal to the U.S. 
		Supreme Court. A lawyer for the association declined comment Tuesday, 
		and Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro's office said it had no immediate 
		comment. 
		 
		[to top of second column] 
			 | 
            
             
              
		For three years, from 2017 to 2019, the Legislature and then-Gov. Tom 
		Wolf sought the association's cash to help plug a deficit in the state 
		government's operating budget. 
		 
		The association sued, winning repeatedly in federal court. U.S. District 
		Judge Christopher Conner ruled that the association was a private entity 
		and that it was unconstitutional to take its surplus without fair 
		compensation. 
		 
		But in Tuesday's decision, Judge Kent A. Jordan of the 3rd Circuit wrote 
		that the state created the association as part of a broader effort to 
		maintain a health care system. The association’s cash is the result of 
		those goals and its policyholders and members don't have a legal 
		interest in its assets, Jordan wrote. 
		 
		“It is difficult to imagine where the assets, including the surplus, 
		would go except to the Commonwealth, as the JUA has no private 
		stakeholders, no property in trust, and no charitable purpose,” he 
		wrote. 
		 
		The association has said in court papers that its reserves were 
		generated from policyholder premiums and that taxpayer money never 
		funded any of its operations. 
			
			
			All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved  |