Illinois appeals court hears challenge to Illinois’ gun ID law
		
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [December 20, 2024]  
		By Greg Bishop | The Center Square 
		
		(The Center Square) – Whether Illinois’ Firearm Owner’s ID card is 
		constitutional is now up to a state appellate court. 
		 
		Illinois is one of only a handful of states that requires individuals to 
		have a specific permit or ID to purchase firearms and one of only two 
		states that requires one to possess firearms or ammunition. 
		 
		Guns Save Life brought the case against the state, saying the law 
		violates the Second Amendment. The Sangamon County court sided with the 
		state. 
		 
		A three-judge panel of the Illinois Fourth District Appellate Court 
		heard the case Thursday. 
		 
		Plaintiffs argued the law violates the plain text of the Second 
		Amendment and the only comparable historical laws the state has are 
		defunct loyalty oath laws and race-based prohibitions on specific 
		firearms. 
		 
		“Just like you wouldn’t require a license to pray at home or post an 
		unpopular opinion on X,” said Guns Save Life attorney Clark Hildabrand. 
		
		
		  
		
		The state argued they have the power to impose low barrier regulations 
		to ensure dangerous individuals don’t access firearms. 
		 
		“Government can regulate to seek to keep firearms out of the hands of 
		people who are dangerous and therefore likely to misuse them,” said 
		attorney Jane Elinor Notz representing Illinois State Police Director 
		Brendan Kelly. “That applies to public carry and at home protection.” 
		
		Judge Craig DeArmond pushed back on Notz, saying recent U.S. Supreme 
		Court precedent dealt with allowing some regulations for public carry, 
		not for keeping firearms in the home. DeArmond and Notz went back and 
		forth on a variety of issues. 
		
		“I know your doing your best to not answer the question, but it’ll go 
		faster if you do,” DeArmond said when questioning Notz on the state’s 
		position. 
		 
		[to top of second column] 
			 | 
            
             
            
			  
            A mockup of an Illinois Firearm Owners ID Card 
			isp.illinois.gov 
            
			
			
			  
            Plaintiffs rebutted the state, saying FOID impacts everyone, not 
			someone a court found to be a prohibited person. 
			 
			“Illinois has the firearm restraining order law that would operate 
			more similarly, but here the FOID law applies generally to all law 
			abiding citizens, those who are impacted by the law,” Hildabrand 
			said. “Other prohibitions already impact felons.” 
			 
			Guns Save Life Executive Director John Boch, who brought the case, 
			feels they got a favorable panel of justices. 
			 
			“Judge DeArmond that savaged representative from [Attorney General] 
			Kwame Raoul’s office, just saveged her with her talking points and 
			just outright calling her incorrect in some of her assertions,” Boch 
			told The Center Square after Thursday’s hearing. “I’ve never seen an 
			oral argument get that testy and rough for either side’s counsel.” 
			 
			Boch said it’s simple. The court must weigh the law against the 
			plain text of the second amendment and whether there are any 
			historical comparison laws to the FOID card for whether it can 
			withstand scrutiny. 
			 
			“Clearly there’s no historical precedent whatsoever for something 
			like this in the colonial times,” Boch said. 
			 
			The appeals court took the case under advisement. Boch said 
			regardless of how the case goes, it’s expected to go to the Illinois 
			Supreme Court, and then possibly to the U.S. Supreme Court. 
			
			All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved 
			
			   |