Illinois’ pending swipe fee law on hold after court ruling
Send a link to a friend
[December 27, 2024]
By Kevin Bessler | The Center Square
The Center Square) – An Illinois law banning banks and credit card
companies from charging swipe fees on taxes and tips continues to play
out in court.
A U.S. District Court judge has issued a preliminary injunction
preventing the state from enforcing the Interchange Fee Prohibition Act
on nationally chartered banks and savings institutions, but not on
credit card companies and Illinois banks. That means, as of right now,
the state can enforce the law on those institutions starting in July.
The state law, which bars national banks from collecting certain fees
from customers directly, constrains the National Bank Act, the judge
said in the ruling.
The American Bankers Association and the Illinois Bankers Association
are leading the lawsuit saying the Interchange Fee Prohibition Act
violates federal law.
[to top of second column]
|
“We look forward to answering the judge’s questions to ensure that
this relief applies to all financial institutions involved in the
Illinois payment system, so the customers they serve will also be
protected from the harm [the] IFPA will cause if it is allowed to
move forward,” said the American Bankers Association, Illinois
Bankers Association, America’s Credit Unions, and the Illinois
Credit Union League in a statement.
Rob Karr, president of the Illinois Retail Merchants Association,
said the ruling will provide tangible relief to Illinois families,
which their survey shows are in favor of the law.
“Eighty-six percent of voters agree that it is unfair for banks and
credit card companies to charge businesses swipe fees on sales taxes
they collect for the state of Illinois and units of local
government,” said Karr.
Gov. J.B. Pritzker said the change was the best outcome for Illinois
retailers, who will also be capped in the discount they get for
collecting and remitting sales taxes. But the Electronic Payments
Coalition said the Illinois law is an example of troubling
self-dealing by a state government.
The court is scheduled to hear additional arguments on Jan. 15. |