The US says it pushed retraction of a famine warning for north Gaza. Aid 
		groups express concern
		
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [December 27, 2024]  
		By ELLEN KNICKMEYER 
		
		WASHINGTON (AP) — A lead organization monitoring for food crises around 
		the world withdrew a new report this week warning of imminent famine in 
		north Gaza under what it called Israel's “near-total blockade,” after 
		the U.S. asked for its retraction, U.S. officials told The Associated 
		Press. The move follows public criticism of the report from the U.S. 
		ambassador to Israel. 
		 
		The rare public challenge from the Biden administration of the work of 
		the U.S.-funded Famine Early Warning System, which is meant to reflect 
		the data-driven analysis of unbiased experts, drew accusations from aid 
		and human-rights figures of possible U.S. political interference. A 
		finding of famine would be a rebuke of close U.S. ally Israel, which has 
		insisted that its 15-month war in Gaza is aimed against the Hamas 
		militant group and not against its civilian population. 
		 
		U.S. ambassador to Israel Jacob Lew earlier this week called the warning 
		by the internationally recognized group inaccurate and “irresponsible." 
		Lew and the U.S. Agency for International Development, which funds the 
		monitoring group, both said the findings failed to properly account for 
		rapidly changing circumstances in north Gaza. 
		 
		The U.S. Embassy in Israel and the State Department declined comment. 
		FEWS confirmed Thursday it had retracted its famine warning, and said it 
		expected to re-release the report in January with updated data and 
		analysis. The group declined further comment. 
		 
		“We work day and night with the U.N. and our Israeli partners to meet 
		humanitarian needs — which are great — and relying on inaccurate data is 
		irresponsible,” Lew said Tuesday. 
		
		  
		
		USAID confirmed to the AP that it had asked the famine-monitoring 
		organization to withdraw its stepped-up warning of imminent famine, 
		issued in a report dated Monday. 
		 
		The dispute points in part to the difficulty of assessing the extent of 
		starvation in largely isolated northern Gaza, where thousands in recent 
		weeks have fled an intensified Israeli military crackdown that aid 
		groups say has allowed delivery of only a dozen trucks of food and water 
		since roughly October. 
		 
		FEWS Net said in its withdrawn report that unless Israel changes its 
		policy, it expects the number of people dying of starvation and related 
		ailments in north Gaza to reach between two and 15 per day sometime 
		between January and March. 
		 
		The internationally recognized mortality threshold for famine is two or 
		more deaths a day per 10,000 people. 
		 
		FEWS was created by the U.S. development agency in the 1980s and is 
		still funded by it. But it is intended to provide independent, neutral 
		and data-driven assessments of hunger crises, including in war zones. 
		Its findings help guide decisions on aid by the U.S. and other 
		governments and agencies around the world. 
		 
		A spokesman for Israel's foreign ministry, Oren Marmorstein, welcomed 
		the U.S. ambassador's public challenge of the famine warning. “FEWS NET 
		- Stop spreading these lies!” Marmorstein said on X. 
		 
		In challenging the findings publicly, the U.S. ambassador "leveraged his 
		political power to undermine the work of this expert agency,” said Scott 
		Paul, a senior manager at the Oxfam America humanitarian nonprofit. Paul 
		stressed that he was not weighing in on the accuracy of the data or 
		methodology of the report. 
		 
		“The whole point of creating FEWS is to have a group of experts make 
		assessments about imminent famine that are untainted by political 
		considerations,” said Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human 
		Rights Watch and now a visiting professor in international affairs at 
		Princeton University. “It sure looks like USAID is allowing political 
		considerations -- the Biden administration’s worry about funding 
		Israel’s starvation strategy -- to interfere." 
		
		Israel says it has been operating in recent months against Hamas 
		militants still active in northern Gaza. It says the vast majority of 
		the area’s residents have fled and relocated to Gaza City, where most 
		aid destined for the north is delivered. But some critics, including a 
		former defense minister, have accused Israel of carrying out ethnic 
		cleansing in Gaza’s far north, near the Israeli border. 
		 
		[to top of second column] 
			 | 
            
             
            
			  
            Palestinian women and girls struggle to reach for food at a 
			distribution center in Khan Younis, Gaza Strip Friday, Dec. 6, 2024. 
			(AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana, File) 
            
			
			  
            North Gaza has been one of the areas hardest-hit by fighting and 
			Israel’s restrictions on aid throughout its war with Hamas 
			militants. Global famine monitors and U.N. and U.S. officials have 
			warned repeatedly of the imminent risk of malnutrition and deaths 
			from starvation hitting famine levels. 
			 
			International officials say Israel last summer increased the amount 
			of aid it was admitting there, under U.S. pressure. The U.S. and 
			U.N. have said Gaza’s people as a whole need between 350 and 500 
			trucks a day of food and other vital needs. 
			 
			But the U.N. and aid groups say Israel recently has again blocked 
			almost all aid to that part of Gaza. Cindy McCain, the American head 
			of the U.N. World Food Program, called earlier this month for 
			political pressure to get food flowing to Palestinians there. 
			 
			Israel says it places no restrictions on aid entering Gaza and that 
			hundreds of truckloads of goods are piled up at Gaza’s crossings and 
			accused international aid agencies of failing to deliver the 
			supplies. The U.N. and other aid groups say Israeli restrictions, 
			ongoing combat, looting and insufficient security by Israeli troops 
			make it impossible to deliver aid effectively. 
			 
			Lew, the U.S. ambassador, said the famine warning was based on 
			“outdated and inaccurate” data. He pointed to uncertainty over how 
			many of the 65,000-75,000 people remaining in northern Gaza had fled 
			in recent weeks, saying that skewed the findings. 
			 
			FEWS said in its report that its famine assessment holds even if as 
			few as 10,000 people remain. 
			 
			USAID in its statement to AP said it had reviewed the report before 
			it became public, and noted “discrepancies” in population estimates 
			and some other data. The U.S. agency had asked the famine warning 
			group to address those uncertainties and be clear in its final 
			report to reflect how those uncertainties affected its predictions 
			of famine, it said. 
			 
			“This was relayed before Ambassador Lew’s statement,” USAID said in 
			a statement. “FEWS NET did not resolve any of these concerns and 
			published in spite of these technical comments and a request for 
			substantive engagement before publication. As such, USAID asked to 
			retract the report.” 
			 
			Roth criticized the U.S. challenge of the report in light of the 
			gravity of the crisis there. 
            
			  
			“This quibbling over the number of people desperate for food seems a 
			politicized diversion from the fact that the Israeli government is 
			blocking virtually all food from getting in,” he said, adding that 
			“the Biden administration seems to be closing its eyes to that 
			reality, but putting its head in the sand won’t feed anyone.” 
			 
			The U.S., Israel’s main backer, provided a record amount of military 
			support in the first year of the war. At the same time, the Biden 
			administration repeatedly urged Israel to allow more access to aid 
			deliveries in Gaza overall, and warned that failing to do so could 
			trigger U.S. restrictions on military support. The administration 
			recently said Israel was making improvements and declined to carry 
			out its threat of restrictions. 
			 
			Military support for Israel’s war in Gaza is politically charged in 
			the U.S., with Republicans and some Democrats staunchly opposed any 
			effort to limit U.S. support over the suffering of Palestinian 
			civilians trapped in the conflict. The Biden administration’s 
			reluctance to do more to press Israel for improved treatment of 
			civilians undercut support for Democrats in last month’s elections. 
			___ 
			 
			Sam Mednick and Josef Federman in Jerusalem contributed to this 
			report. 
			
			All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved 
			
			   |