Doctor who prescribed more than 500,000 opioid doses has conviction
tossed
Send a link to a friend
[February 03, 2024]
By Jonathan Stempel
(Reuters) - A Virginia doctor who prescribed more than 500,000 opioid
doses in less than two years had his conviction and 40-year prison
sentence thrown out by a federal appeals court on Friday, because the
jury instructions misstated the law.
The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia also ordered
a new trial for Joel Smithers, 41, who has been serving his sentence in
an Atlanta prison.
Overprescription of painkillers is one of the main causes of the
nation's opioid crisis. Nearly 645,000 people died in the United States
from overdoses involving opioids from 1999 to 2021, including 80,411 in
2021 alone, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
Prosecutors said Smithers prescribed controlled substances including
fentanyl, hydromorphone, oxycodone and oxymorphone to every patient he
saw at the Martinsville, Virginia office he opened in August 2015.
A majority of patients traveled hundreds of miles each way to see
Smithers, who did not accept insurance and collected more than $700,000
in cash and credit card payments before law enforcement raided his
office in March 2017, prosecutors said.
Jurors convicted Smithers on 861 counts in May 2019, after being
instructed that the government needed to prove he acted "without a
legitimate medical purpose or beyond the bounds of medical practice."
The appeals court found this instruction defective in light of a 2022
U.S. Supreme Court decision that said the crime of prescribing
controlled substances required a defendant to "knowingly or
intentionally" act in an unauthorized manner.
[to top of second column]
|
![](../images/020324PIX/health23.jpg)
Tablets of Hydrocodone at a pharmacy in Portsmouth, Ohio, June 21,
2017. REUTERS/Bryan Woolston
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2024/Feb/03/images/ads/current/businessdirectory_dailycover_2023.png) Writing for a three-judge panel,
Circuit Judge Roger Gregory said Smithers' jury instructions were
defective because jurors could have convicted him solely for acting
outside the bounds of medical practice, regardless of his knowledge
or intent.
He also said such an error was not harmless, even in cases with
"copious evidence of a defendant's guilt."
The office of U.S. Attorney Christopher Kavanaugh in the Western
District of Virginia did not immediately respond to a request for
comment.
"A doctor's guilt depends purely on his subjective beliefs," said
Beau Brindley, a lawyer for Smithers. "Any attempt by the government
to pretend otherwise was resoundingly rejected."
The case is U.S. v. Smithers, 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No.
19-4761.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Bill Berkrot)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |