What is next for Donald Trump at the US Supreme Court?
Send a link to a friend
[February 09, 2024]
By John Kruzel and Andrew Chung
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday seemed poised
to rule in favor of former President Donald Trump in a legal fight over
whether he is eligible to remain on the ballot as he seeks to regain the
presidency despite his actions around the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack
by his supporters.
It may not be the only Trump case the court will consider this election
year. Trump also is expected to go to the Supreme Court by Monday to
contest a lower court's decision rejecting his claim of immunity from
criminal charges related to his attempts to overturn his 2020 election
loss.
Here is a look at what is next.
TRUMP WIN SEEMS LIKELY IN COLORADO CASE
During arguments in the Colorado case, Supreme Court justices signaled
that they were inclined to rule in favor of Trump in his appeal of a
Dec. 19 ruling by Colorado's top court to disqualify him from the
state's Republican March 5 primary ballot under the U.S. Constitution's
14th Amendment after finding that he participated in an insurrection.
Conservative and liberal justices alike expressed concern about states
having the power on their own to disqualify a presidential candidate
without Congress first passing legislation that spells out how the
Constitution's disqualification provision should be enforced.
HOW QUICKLY WILL A RULING COME?
The Supreme Court has moved briskly in Trump's appeal of the Colorado
court ruling. Within days of Trump filing for appeal, the justices took
up his case, announced rapid deadlines for legal briefs and scheduled
arguments for just over a month later.
Colorado voters who had challenged Trump's eligibility urged the court
to rule before the state's March 5 Republican primary election, part of
the state-by-state race for the Republican nomination to challenge
Democratic President Joe Biden in the Nov. 5 general election.
WHAT DOES THIS CASE MEAN FOR SIMILAR CHALLENGES?
How the court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, handles Trump's
appeal in the Colorado case is likely to determine whether similar
efforts underway in states including Maine will succeed or fail.
[to top of second column]
|
Former U.S. President Donald Trump greets to his supporters, as he
arrives from his second civil trial after E. Jean Carroll accused
Trump of raping her decades ago, outside a Trump Tower in the
Manhattan borough of New York City, U.S., January 25, 2024.
REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz
The Colorado Supreme Court's ruling marked the first time that
Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment - the so-called
disqualification clause - had been used to deem a presidential
candidate ineligible.
The justices potentially could set a nationwide precedent squarely
answering the question of whether Section 3 bars Trump's eligibility
due to his actions involving the Capitol attack. Under such a
scenario, state courts would apply the Supreme Court's ruling in
deciding any disqualification bids.
But the justices have other options as well, including a ruling
announcing that Congress must first pass a law before a state can
enforce the disqualification clause against a candidate. Such an
outcome would effectively shift the question of Trump's eligibility
to federal lawmakers.
WILL THE IMPENDING COLORADO RULING AFFECT OTHER TRUMP CASES?
While the Colorado case governs Trump's ballot presence, the Supreme
Court's potential future decision on his criminal immunity assertion
could have election implications as well. According to Reuters/Ipsos
polling, Republican voters have said they would be less likely to
cast a ballot for Trump if he were to convicted of a crime. He has
been indicted in four separate cases.
The court's ruling in the Colorado case may not telegraph how the
justices might resolve his immunity claim.
The justices also have agreed to decide whether a man involved in
the Capitol attack can be charged with obstructing an official
proceeding - the congressional certification of the 2020 election
results. That case has potential implications for the prosecution of
Trump, who faces the same charge in one of the four criminal cases.
(Reporting by John Kruzel; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.]This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |