Trump loses bid to pause $454.2 million judgment in NY civil fraud case
Send a link to a friend
[February 29, 2024]
By Jonathan Stempel and Luc Cohen
NEW YORK (Reuters) -Donald Trump on Wednesday lost a bid to pause a
$454.2 million civil fraud judgment against him for overstating his net
worth and real estate values to dupe lenders, meaning he must soon find
the cash or post a bond to prevent New York authorities from seizing his
property while he appeals.
The decision by Associate Justice Anil Singh of the New York Appellate
Division must be affirmed by a full panel of the mid-level state appeals
court. Singh granted Trump's request for a stay of a portion of Justice
Arthur Engoron's Feb. 16 decision barring the former president from
running any New York corporation or seeking loans from the state's banks
for three years.
Trump's lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment on
Singh's decision.
In asking for the stay earlier on Wednesday, Trump's lawyers said he is
unable to post a bond for the full amount of the judgment while he
appeals and wants instead to secure a $100 million bond. A bonding
company would be on the hook for any payout if Trump loses his appeal
and proves unable to pay.
Trump is the frontrunner for the Republican nomination to challenge
Democratic President Joe Biden in the Nov. 5 U.S. election.
New York Attorney General Letitia James sued Trump, the Trump
Organization and other defendants in 2022 in state court in Manhattan,
accusing them of falsifying the values of Trump's properties to obtain
better terms from lenders and insurers. A three-month trial over the
claims ended in January.
In their filing with the Appellate Division, Trump's lawyers said a stay
of Engoron's decision was needed because Trump would suffer "irreparable
harm" if James were free to sell his real estate assets to raise capital
to pay the judgment.
The lawyers also said the "exorbitant and punitive amount of the
judgment coupled with an unlawful and unconstitutional blanket
prohibition on lending transactions would make it impossible to secure
and post a complete bond."
They said a $100 million bond, together with Trump's "vast" real estate
holdings and ongoing oversight by a court-designated monitor for the
Trump Organization, would be more than sufficient to secure the
judgment.
But Singh's decision means Trump may now apply for a loan to help post a
bond.
[to top of second column]
|
Former U.S. President Donald Trump attends the closing arguments in
the Trump Organization civil fraud trial at New York State Supreme
Court in the Manhattan borough of New York City, U.S., January 11,
2024. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton/File Photo
In a separate filing on Wednesday, James opposed a stay, calling it
"especially inappropriate" given the defendants "all but concede"
that Trump does not have enough liquid assets to satisfy the
judgment.
"These are precisely the circumstances for which a full bond or
deposit is necessary, where defendants' approach would leave (the
attorney general's office) with substantial shortfalls once this
court affirms the judgment," James wrote.
Both sides are expected to submit more written arguments in the
coming weeks, and a decision could come after March 18.
RISK OF EVASION
James also said there was "substantial risk" that Trump might not
pay up, or might move assets beyond her reach, if he loses his
appeal. She cited the defendants' having "surreptitiously" concealed
from the monitor a $40 million transfer, and Trump's recent
announcement that some of his businesses had moved to Florida.
Trump has estimated his net worth in the billions of dollars, but
much of that is in real estate, not cash.
Engoron imposed a $354.9 million penalty against Trump, plus daily
interest that began to accrue in 2019. The payout had grown to
$454.2 million with interest by Feb. 22, and additional interest is
tacked on each day.
Trump is also seeking to avoid posting a full bond during an
expected appeal of last month's $83.3 million defamation verdict in
favor of the writer E. Jean Carroll. He has asked the judge in that
case to let him appeal without posting any security, or
alternatively by posting at most a $24.5 million unsecured bond.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel and Luc Cohen in New York; Additional
reporting by Jack Queen; Editing by Will Dunham, Jonathan Oatis,
Daniel Wallis and Noeleen Walder)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.]This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|