Black Americans would feel the sting of Republican budget cut proposals
Send a link to a friend
[January 04, 2024]
By Richard Cowan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - When Charla Plaines saw the toll lead paint took
on her granddaughter, she was able to get the hazardous substance
scrubbed from her home thanks to a federally funded program that
Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives want to cut.
Black Americans, including Plaines, a 66-year-old grandmother in
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, would be disproportionately hit by this and
many other cuts lawmakers are pushing as Congress faces a government
shutdown deadline this month.
No amount of lead is considered safe, but tests showed Plaines'
now-11-year-old granddaughter, Loyalty Johnson, suffered significant
developmental delays from a substantially elevated blood level above the
threshold set by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). A
2020 study published by the National Institutes of Health found Black
children had 2.8 times higher odds of elevated blood lead levels
compared with white and Hispanic children.
As she prepared for a great-grandchild also spending time at her home,
Plaines in 2022 had $15,000 worth of lead-contaminated doors, window
frames and other materials removed, financed by a 30-year-old U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development program.
The program is one of many targeted by House Republicans'
belt-tightening campaign, which comes amid high budget deficits that are
the result of Republican and Democratic policies.
The Republican-controlled House Appropriations Committee crafted 12
partisan government spending bills that Chairwoman Kay Granger boasted
are "the most conservative appropriations bills in history."
Marc Morial, head of the National Urban League, a civil rights and urban
advocacy organization, dismissed them as "a large list of politically
and racially motivated special interest initiatives."
"Blame the poor. Blame the Blacks and Latinos" for fiscal problems, he
added.
Brian Riedl, senior fellow at the conservative Manhattan Institute, said
there is room to reduce spending on some programs or merge them with
others. Unlike many conservatives, he also backs exploring tax increases
as one salve for Washington's fiscal woes.
"I won't deny that budget cuts are painful and there are people who are
harmed by them, absolutely," Riedl said.
"There's no way I would have been able to afford the improvements" the
HUD grant financed, Harrisburg grandmother Plaines said.
Other racial groups would be affected. For example, Republican-proposed
"food stamps" reductions for the poor would largely affect white people
who comprise nearly half its recipients.
The hit that Black Americans would take is particularly disproportionate
in other areas of the budget.
They include termination of a 32-year-old "Healthy Start" program to
battle infant mortality and a 67% funding cut to rehabilitate and build
affordable housing units.
House Republicans backed some funding increases, however, such as a $96
million hike in homeless assistance grants.
Republicans argue there are better ways to administer activities on
their chopping block by merging them with similar programs or clawing
back unspent funds.
Democrats and President Joe Biden's administration disagree, saying the
programs would wither.
[to top of second column]
|
Charla Plaines, a 66-year-old grandmother, poses for a portrait
outside of her home in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, U.S., December 28,
2023. REUTERS/Cheriss May
Meanwhile, low-income college students would see a $1,000 reduction
in Pell Grants that most Black undergraduates obtain for tuition.
"Virtually every (House Appropriations) bill has riders blocking the
ability of the Biden administration to focus on social justice and
diversity," said Charles Kieffer, a former Democratic budget and
appropriations aide.
Republican Representative Tom Cole, who oversees housing funding,
said reductions are the byproduct of tight spending caps on
selective programs: "You have a top line ... and the top-line number
is low."
HOUSES ARE 'SO OLD'
Slightly over half of Harrisburg's 50,000 population is Black;
one-quarter is Hispanic or Latino.
"The housing stock is so old, we never fail to find lead hazards,"
said Dave Olsen, manager of Harrisburg's $5 million Lead Hazard
Reduction Demonstration grant.
Lead-based paint was banned in 1978 because of severe neurological
problems it causes in young children.
By April, 262 Harrisburg housing units will have been cleansed under
the current round of grants, Olsen said.
Federal officials contend that for every dollar it spends on
removing lead paint, between $17 to $200 is saved by improved child
health.
House Republicans would fund the lead program at $65 million below
last year's $410 million. It also would capture $560 million that
was to be dispatched over three years.
Representative Rosa DeLauro, the senior House Appropriations
Democrat, said that would mean 33,000 fewer low-income families
getting homes scrubbed of lead, resulting in about 46,000 children
continuing to be exposed.
Another housing program, financing construction and rehabilitation
of low-income homes, which has been functioning since the early
1990s, would see a two-thirds reduction from its $1.5 billion last
year.
Robert Henson, of the National Council of State Housing Agencies,
said the Republican provision would mean about 17,000 fewer
affordable homes built or rehabilitated this year and about 5,000
fewer households supported.
While Congress battles over what to cut and what to protect, Charla
Plaines sees firsthand the value of government addressing social
needs.
Her granddaughter, she explains, has required speech therapy and
struggles with reading and math, although "her vocabulary is
definitely improved." Doctors cited lead exposure as the cause. She
and her family think Loyalty was exposed to high doses of lead from
a pacifier she sometimes placed, unknowingly, on a contaminated
window sill.
(Reporting by Richard Cowan; Editing by Scott Malone and Jonathan
Oatis)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |