One
year ago Wednesday, Gov. J.B. Pritzker enacted the Protect
Illinois Communities Act despite sheriffs and state’s attorneys
across the state saying they won’t make enforcement of the law a
top priority.
“Well you don’t get to choose which laws you comply with in the
state of Illinois. Let’s be clear,” Pritzker said after signing
the bill on Jan. 10, 2023.
The gun ban included a registry with a deadline of Jan. 1, 2024
to comply. About 98.7% of Illinois Firearm Owners ID card
holders didn’t register now banned weapons, but not all own
them. Former state Sen. Darren Bailey was among those who did
not, saying the gun ban is unconstitutional.
“Our Founding Fathers’ original intent, they guaranteed, they
assured, they understood what inalienable rights are and those
are rights that are given to we the people, people, individuals,
by God, and actually it is up to the government to protect those
rights,” said Bailey, R-Xenia.
Pritzker anticipated court challenges after signing the law.
“The law here that we now have enacted is constitutional. There
was a lot of thought that went into it to make sure that it
would be,” Pritzker said last year.
The law has faced multiple legal challenges since, in both state
and federal courts. Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to
hear state Rep. Dan Caulkins’ appeal of a state-level challenge
decided by the Illinois Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court
also denied preliminary requests from other plaintiffs to block
the law while the case played out on the merits.
Richard Pearson with the Illinois State Rifle Association said
they plan to soon take their appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court in
a separate challenge.
“The number of gun owners in this country has never been higher.
People are rebelling against this. So, I look forward to the
Supreme Court overruling the PICA act,” Pearson said.
Friday, a separate challenge in the Southern District of
Illinois federal court has a scheduling conference to start
addressing the merits of the case. In that case, Judge Stephen
McGlynn Monday ordered litigants to be prepared to discuss
whether or not they plan to have witnesses or expert testimony
during the evidentiary hearing.
|
|