FAA faces tough questions about Boeing oversight after 737 MAX emergency
Send a link to a friend
[January 10, 2024]
By David Shepardson
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Federal Aviation Administration is facing
questions about its oversight of planemaker Boeing following the
emergency landing on Friday of an Alaska Airlines 737 MAX 9.
Mike Whitaker, who took over as the agency's head in late October, will
testify before the U.S. House Transportation and Infrastructure
Committee on Feb. 6, sources said. The hearing was in the works before
the Alaska Airlines flight and is expected to cover a broad range of
issues.
The 737 MAX is certain to come up at the hearing, the sources said.
The FAA, which was without a permanent administrator for 18 months until
Whitaker's 98-0 confirmation, has come under growing scrutiny after a
series of potentially catastrophic near-miss aviation safety incidents,
persistent air traffic control staffing shortages and a January 2023
pilot messaging database outage that disrupted 11,000 flights.
Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal on Tuesday asked the FAA to answer
detailed questions about its handling of the Alaska Airlines incident.
The FAA MAX 9 grounding order "is the least that should be done,"
Blumenthal said, adding he wanted to know "what more the FAA is doing to
ensure our skies are safe."
Blumenthal added: "This disturbing event is another black mark for
Boeing’s 737 MAX aircraft fleet and troublingly, appears to be part of a
wider pattern."
The FAA grounded 171 MAX 9 airplanes on Saturday and said on Tuesday
they would remain out of the sky until the agency was satisfied with
Boeing's inspection and maintenance instructions.
Republican Senator J.D. Vance on Tuesday urged the Senate Commerce
Committee to hold a hearing. "Every American deserves a full explanation
from Boeing and the FAA on what’s gone wrong and on the steps that are
being taken to ensure another incident does not occur in the future," he
said.
The FAA has scrutinized Boeing's quality and other issues in recent
years as it faced harsh criticism for its actions in the run-up to the
MAX certification. Following two fatal crashes in 2018 and 2019, the FAA
grounded the plane for 20 months and mandated significant software and
training improvements.
[to top of second column]
|
The fuselage plug area of Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 Boeing 737-9
MAX, which was forced to make an emergency landing with a gap in the
fuselage, is seen during its investigation by the National
Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) in Portland, Oregon, U.S. January
7, 2024. NTSB/Handout via REUTERS/ File Photo
Boeing declined to comment on Tuesday.
The FAA continues to inspect each 737 MAX before an "airworthiness
certificate is issued and cleared for delivery," the agency has
noted. Typically the FAA delegates the final signoff on individual
airplanes to the manufacturer once the model has been certified.
Alaska Airlines and the other U.S. 737 MAX 9 operator, United
Airlines, said on Monday they found loose parts on multiple grounded
aircraft.
The FAA did not directly answer questions about how it typically
inspects those bolts before approving a plane for service. "The FAA
inspects every airplane prior to issuing an airworthiness
certificate," a spokesperson said.
The agency is still deciding whether to certify the smaller MAX 7.
Whitaker told Reuters in an interview last month that he has no
"specific timetable" to certify the plane, adding the agency will
certify the plane when "we have all the data that we need and it is
safe."
A 2020 congressional report concluded the MAX crashes "were the
horrific culmination of a series of faulty technical assumptions by
Boeing’s engineers, a lack of transparency on the part of Boeing’s
management, and grossly insufficient oversight by the FAA."
After the Alaska Airlines data from last Friday's emergency landing
was lost, National Transportation Safety Board Chair Jennifer
Homendy this week criticized the FAA's decision not to require
retrofitting of airplanes with recorders that capture 25 hours of
data.
The FAA has boosted Boeing oversight staffing and in 2022, the
agency gave Boeing a shorter regulatory compliance program extension
than the planemaker sought in order to "verify that Boeing completes
required improvements."
(Reporting by David Shepardson in WashingtonEditing by Matthew
Lewis)
[© 2023 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |