| 
		Redesigned Apple Watches not subject to import ban, US Customs says
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [January 16, 2024]  By 
		Blake Brittain 
 (Reuters) -A U.S. law enforcement agency has determined that Apple can 
		use a redesign to bypass an import ban on newer Apple Watch models 
		stemming from its patent infringement dispute with Masimo, the 
		medical-monitoring technology company said in a court filing on Monday.
 
 The import ban, issued by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), 
		applies to Apple's current Series 9 and Ultra 2 watches and initially 
		went into effect on Dec. 26. Apple convinced the U.S. Court of Appeals 
		for the Federal Circuit to pause the ban the next day, and has since 
		resumed selling the watches as it contests the import ruling.
 
 Apple had said that a proposed redesign would allow it to circumvent 
		findings that the watches infringe Masimo's blood-oxygen reading pulse 
		oximetry patents. Apple has not publicly described the redesign, which 
		could involve an update to the watches' software.
 
 According to Masimo's filing on Monday with the Federal Circuit, Apple 
		told the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency that its redesigned 
		watches "definitively do not contain pulse oximetry functionality." 
		Apple's filings with U.S. Customs and the agency's decision, issued 
		Friday, have not been released publicly.
 
 "Apple's claim that its redesigned watch does not contain pulse oximetry 
		is a positive step toward accountability," a Masimo spokesperson said on 
		Monday.
 
		
		 
		Apple said on Monday that Series 9 and Ultra 2 watches with blood-oxygen 
		reading capabilities are still available.
 Irvine, California-based Masimo has accused Apple of hiring away its 
		employees and stealing its pulse oximetry technology to use in Apple 
		Watches after discussing a potential collaboration.
 
 Apple has included a pulse oximeter feature in smartwatches since its 
		Series 6 Apple Watch in 2020.
 
 Masimo sued Apple in California that year, alleging that Apple stole 
		trade secrets related to technology for reading blood-oxygen levels and 
		infringed Masimo patents.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            An Apple logo is pictured outside an Apple store in Lille, France, 
			September 13, 2023. REUTERS/Stephanie Lecocq 
            
			 
            Apple countersued Masimo for patent infringement, calling Masimo's 
			legal actions a "maneuver to clear a path" for a competing 
			smartwatch. Masimo released its W1 watch, which tracks blood-oxygen 
			levels and other health indicators, in 2022.
 Masimo asked the ITC in 2021 to bar Apple's imports and sales of 
			Apple Watches that allegedly infringed its patents. The ITC ruled 
			for Masimo last year and the ban went into effect in December. Apple 
			briefly stopped sales of its latest Series 9 and Ultra 2 watches in 
			the United States before Christmas due to the ITC decision, though 
			they remained available from other U.S. retailers including Amazon, 
			Best Buy, Costco and Walmart. The tech giant resumed selling the 
			watches Dec. 27 after the Federal Circuit said it would pause the 
			ban while it considers whether Apple's appeal should put the ITC's 
			decision on hold.
 
 Apple said on Monday that the appeal would likely take at least a 
			year, and that it expects a decision on its request to keep the ban 
			paused during that time as early as Tuesday.
 
 The Federal Circuit is still considering whether to continue the 
			pause or reinstate the ban, which would apply to Series 9 and Ultra 
			2 Apple Watches with pulse oximetry technology that do not have the 
			redesign.
 
 Apple has argued that it is likely to win the appeal and that 
			allowing the ban to stay in effect would cause significant harm to 
			the company, its suppliers and the public.
 
 Masimo has said that maintaining the pause would hurt its business 
			and reputation and "demoralize" its scientists and engineers. It 
			also said in its Monday filing that the Customs decision undermines 
			Apple's argument that reinstating the ban would cause the tech giant 
			irreparable harm.
 
 (Reporting by Blake Brittain in WashingtonEditing by David Bario, 
			Alexia Garamfalvi and Matthew Lewis)
 
			[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.]This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
 |