Pharma price cut proposals from US government could be steep, analysts
say
Send a link to a friend
[January 30, 2024]
By Michael Erman
(Reuters) -Pharmaceutical companies are due to receive by Thursday the
U.S. government's opening proposal for what are expected to be
significant discounts on 10 of its high-cost medicines, an important
step in the Medicare health program's first ever price negotiations.
Five Wall Street analysts and two investors told Reuters they expect the
negotiations over prices that will go into effect in 2026 to result in
cuts ranging from the statutory minimum of 25% to as much as 60% when
the final numbers are set in September.
The drugmakers and the government are expected to wait until then to
disclose them.
President Joe Biden’s signature Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), signed
into law last year, allows Medicare, which covers 66 million Americans
mostly aged 65 and older, to negotiate prices for some of its most
costly drugs.
The price cuts will impact how much the government pays for the drugs as
it aims to save $25 million per year by 2031. It could also save money
for consumers who pay a portion of a drug's cost under their Medicare
plans.
"There's no way to really predict exactly what the discounts will be, so
we just assume they're going to be very high," said Andy Acker, a
portfolio manager for healthcare and biotech at Janus Henderson.
The first 10 drugs include Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer's blood
thinner Eliquis, Merck & Co's diabetes drug Januvia and Johnson &
Johnson's blood thinner Xarelto.
Acker said the impact of the price cuts on company revenue will be
limited for the first group of drugs negotiated because they are due to
face generic competition soon afterwards that would drive down prices
anyway.
Pharmaceutical companies and business groups have filed more than half a
dozen lawsuits to stop the negotiations from taking place, saying that
they are unlawful.
Drug companies say the law's costs will hurt drug development programs
and patients.
The lawsuits have not slowed the implementation timeline: The government
must make its initial offer by Feb. 1 to the companies that make the 10
designated drugs.
[to top of second column]
|
Pharmaceutical tablets and capsules are arranged in the shape of a
U.S. dollar sign on a table in this picture illustration taken in
Ljubljana August 20, 2014. REUTERS/Srdjan Zivulovic/File Photo
Gabelli Funds portfolio manager Jeff
Jonas pointed out that this being an election year, a new president
could try to reverse the law, or that lawsuits challenging it could
succeed in derailing the process.
"There is a long time before those potential cuts would take
effect," Jonas said.
The talks are not confidential, but the government agency overseeing
Medicare has said it will not discuss the ongoing negotiations,
including its initial offers, unless one of the drugmakers decides
to disclose details of the talks. It did not provide a comment on
the extent of the cuts being sought.
Industry lobby group PhRMA called the price negotiation program a
political exercise during a presidential campaign and criticized the
lack of transparency in the process. The group has previously been
against any drug price controls.
"I don't think it's in the drug companies best interest to publicize
the prices until they have to," said Guggenheim Partners analyst
Vamil Divan, noting that they'll likely prefer to negotiate in
private and avoid any resulting hit to share prices earlier than
they have to.
BMO Capital Markets analyst Evan Seigerman said he expects the price
cuts to be close to the 25% minimum set by the law.
Evercore ISI analyst Umer Raffat said investors are generally
modeling roughly 30%-40% cuts, while Guggenheim's Divan said
investor expectations were as high as 60% cuts in prices.
(Reporting by Michael Erman in New York, Additional reporting by
Ahmed Aboulenein in Washington; Editing by Caroline Humer and Bill
Berkrot)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|