Trump seeks pause on classified documents case after Supreme Court
immunity ruling
Send a link to a friend
[July 06, 2024]
By Andrew Goudsward
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Lawyers for Donald Trump asked a U.S. judge on
Friday to partially pause the criminal case accusing the former
president of mishandling classified documents, after the U.S. Supreme
Court ruled that presidents have broad immunity for official acts.
Trump, the Republican presidential candidate, said the Supreme Court's
ruling that he has broad immunity from criminal prosecution in a case
over his attempts to overturn the 2020 election also boosts his claim of
immunity in the classified documents prosecution.
A pause is necessary "to minimize the adverse consequences to the
institution of the presidency arising from this unconstitutional
investigation and prosecution," Trump's lawyers wrote in a court filing.
The request is the latest effort by Trump's legal team to capitalize on
the Supreme Court ruling as he faces four criminal prosecutions. Trump
has already used the decision to delay his sentencing on charges he
falsified business records.
It is also another attempt at delaying the proceedings as Trump seeks to
unseat Democratic President Joe Biden in the Nov. 5 election.
Trump's legal team asked U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump
nominee who is overseeing the documents case, to halt activity until she
rules on Trump's requests to throw out the charges based on his claim of
immunity and his argument that lead prosecutor Jack Smith was unlawfully
appointed.
A spokesperson for Smith declined to comment.
Trump has pleaded not guilty to charges that he illegally retained
sensitive national security documents after leaving office in 2021 and
obstructed government efforts to retrieve the material.
[to top of second column]
|
Former U.S. President and Republican presidential candidate Donald
Trump speaks during his campaign event, in Racine, Wisconsin, U.S.
June 18, 2024. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo
The Supreme Court's ruling that former presidents have broad
immunity for official actions taken as president could complicate
the case.
Trump's lawyers have already argued that Trump's decision to ship
the classified records to his Florida resort was an official act.
Prosecutors working with Smith previously called Trump's claim
"frivolous," arguing the charges all relate to Trump's conduct after
he left the White House.
Trump has also argued that Smith's 2022 appointment to oversee
investigations involving Trump violated the U.S. Constitution
because his office was not created by Congress.
Prosecutors have disputed the claim.
Trump's claims received a boost from conservative Supreme Court
Justice Clarence Thomas. In an opinion agreeing with the court's
conclusion on presidential immunity, Thomas questioned whether Smith
was lawfully appointed.
Thomas' opinion has limited legal authority because he was the only
justice to address the issue, which was not part of the case before
the court. But Trump's lawyers highlighted it in Friday's court
filing as further support for their claims.
(Reporting by Andrew Goudsward; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and
Alistair Bell)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.]This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |