Gaza talks explore alternative to Israeli troops on Gaza-Egypt border:
sources
Send a link to a friend
[July 12, 2024]
By Ahmed Mohamed Hassan and Maayan Lubell
CAIRO (Reuters) - Israeli and Egyptian ceasefire negotiators are in
talks about an electronic surveillance system along the border between
Gaza and Egypt that could allow Israel to pull back its troops from the
area if a ceasefire is agreed, according to two Egyptian sources and a
third source familiar with the matter.
The question of whether Israeli forces stay on the border is one of the
issues blocking a potential ceasefire deal because both Palestinian
militant group Hamas and Egypt, a mediator in the talks, are opposed to
Israel keeping its forces there.
Israel is worried that if its troops leave the border zone, referred to
by Israel as the Philadelphi corridor, Hamas' armed wing could smuggle
in weapons and supplies from Egypt into Gaza via tunnels that would
allow it to re-arm and again threaten Israel.
A surveillance system, if the parties to the negotiations agree on the
details, could therefore smooth the path to agreeing a ceasefire -
though numerous other stumbling blocks remain.
Discussions around a surveillance system on the border have been
reported before, but Reuters is reporting for the first time that Israel
is engaging in the discussions as part of the current round of talks,
with a view to pulling back forces from the border area.
The source familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of
anonymity, said the discussions are about "basically sensors that would
be built on the Egyptian side of the Philadelphi (corridor)."
"The idea is obviously to detect tunnels, to detect any other ways that
they'd be trying to smuggle weapons or people into Gaza. Obviously this
would be a significant element in a hostage agreement."
Asked if this would be significant for a ceasefire deal because it would
mean Israeli soldiers would not have to be on the Philadelphi corridor,
the source said: "Correct."
The two Egyptian security sources, who also spoke on condition of
anonymity, said Israeli negotiators had spoken about a high-tech
surveillance system.
[to top of second column]
|
An Israeli soldier fires a mortar, amid the Israel-Hamas conflict,
near the Israel-Gaza border, in Israel, July 9, 2024. REUTERS/Amir
Cohen/File Photo
Egypt was not opposed to that, if it was supported and paid for by
the United States, according to the two Egyptian sources. They said
though Egypt would not agree to anything that would change border
arrangements between Israel and Egypt set out in a prior peace
treaty.
At a military event on Thursday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu said he could only agree to a deal that preserved Israeli
control of the Gaza-Egypt border, but he did not spell out if that
meant having troops physically present there.
Talks are underway in Qatar and Egypt on a deal, backed by
Washington, that would allow a pause in the fighting in Gaza, now in
its 10th month, and the release of hostages held by Hamas.
Israel started its assault on the Gaza Strip last October after
Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel, killing 1,200
people and capturing more than 250 hostages, according to Israeli
tallies.
Since then, its forces have killed more than 38,000 Palestinians,
according to medical authorities in Gaza.
Israeli officials have said during the war that Hamas used tunnels
running under the border into Egypt's Sinai region to smuggle arms.
Egypt says it destroyed tunnel networks leading to Gaza years ago
and created a buffer zone and border fortifications that prevent
smuggling.
Israel's advance into southern Gaza's Rafah area in early May led to
the closure of the Rafah crossing between Egypt and Gaza and a sharp
reduction in the amount of international aid entering the
Palestinian territory. Egypt says it wants aid deliveries to Gaza to
resume, but that a Palestinian presence should be restored at the
Rafah crossing for it to reopen.
(Maayan Lubell reported from Jerusalem. Additional reporting by
Aidan Lewis; Writing by Christian Lowe; Editing by Angus MacSwan)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|