US judge strikes down Florida ban on gender-affirming healthcare
Send a link to a friend
[June 12, 2024]
By Jonathan Allen
(Reuters) - A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that parts of Florida's ban
of puberty blockers and hormone therapy for transgender children and
restrictions on gender-affirming healthcare for adults are
unconstitutional and ordered that it not be enforced.
Republican Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed the restrictions into
law in 2023, banning people under the age of 18 from receiving puberty
blockers or hormone therapy to treat gender dysphoria, though the law
allowed children who had begun receiving gender-affirming care before
May 17, 2023, to continue to do so with new restrictions.
The law, part of a slew of restrictive legislation in recent years
advanced by Republicans to regulate the lives of transgender people,
also imposed new restrictions on adults receiving gender-affirming
healthcare.
U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle in Tallahassee ruled that all those
elements violated the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of equal protection
under the law, noting that some Florida legislators "plainly acted from
old-fashioned discriminatory animus."
"Gender identity is real," he wrote in his order, ruling that it was
unconstitutional to discriminate against transgender people. "In time,
discrimination against transgender individuals will diminish, just as
racism and misogyny have diminished."
A spokesperson for DeSantis, who signed the ban into law shortly before
announcing his failed bid to become the Republican nominee for the U.S.
presidential election, said the state would appeal the ruling and
referred to gender-affirming healthcare as an aspect of "radical, new
age 'gender ideology.'"
"These procedures do permanent, life-altering damage to children, and
history will look back on this fad in horror," the spokesperson, Julia
Friedland, said in a statement.
The judge noted that doctors who treat transgender patients, multiple
medical associations and the U.S. Department of Health have widely
accepted that the therapies banned by Florida are "well-established
standards of care for treatment of gender dysphoria."
[to top of second column]
|
A person holds up a flag during rally to protest the Trump
administration's reported transgender proposal to narrow the
definition of gender to male or female at birth, at City Hall in New
York City, U.S., October 24, 2018. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File
Photo
Several parents of transgender
children, who were plaintiffs in the lawsuit, gave testimony to the
court that gender-affirming healthcare was allowing their children
to flourish and be happy. A transgender man, another plaintiff,
testified that Florida's new restrictions had interrupted his taking
of testosterone when his prescription lapsed, causing distress,
anxiety and depression.
Because the law allowed healthcare providers to continue providing
puberty blockers or hormone therapy to children and adults who are
not transgender, Hinkle ruled that the law unconstitutionally
discriminated on the basis of sex.
Doctors who violated the law faced up to five years in prison.
The judge noted that Florida lawmakers and Governor DeSantis, in
passing the law, spoke openly about their moral disapproval of
transgender people. This hindered the state's lawyers from
successfully arguing that the law was a good-faith effort to
regulate healthcare and not motivated by unconstitutional
discriminatory animus.
"The statute and the rules were an exercise in politics, not good
medicine," the judge wrote. "The great weight of medical authority
supports these treatments."
(Reporting by Jonathan Allen in New York; Editing by Bill Berkrot)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.]This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|