Elections board dismisses illegal campaign coordination complaint,
declines to clarify law
Send a link to a friend
[June 19, 2024]
By HANNAH MEISEL
Capitol News Illinois
hmeisel@capitolnewsillinois.com
CHICAGO – State elections officials on Tuesday indicated they were
unlikely to step in to clarify what constitutes illegal campaign
coordination after voting to dismiss a complaint alleging such
coordination in the 2022 campaign for governor.
At their monthly meeting in Chicago, Illinois State Board of Elections
members voted 7-1 to adopt a hearing officer’s recommendation to dismiss
a complaint filed by a Democratic party official in the waning days of
the 2022 election cycle. The complaint alleged conservative radio host
and political operative Dan Proft illegally coordinated with former
Republican state Sen. Darren Bailey during his 2022 campaign for
governor.
The hearing officer’s recommendation, which was made public last week
ahead of Tuesday’s meeting, agreed with Proft and Bailey’s contention
that state law was not specific enough to find a violation had occurred.
He found there wasn’t enough evidence to prove that ads Proft produced
during Bailey’s general election challenge to Gov. JB Pritzker amounted
to illegal coordination.
However, the hearing officer recommended the General Assembly update
existing law or the Board of Elections adopt rules to clarify what is
and isn’t allowed by independent expenditure committees like the one
Proft was operating, dubbed the People Who Play by the Rules PAC.
Other than allowing attorneys for Proft, Bailey and the Democratic Party
of Illinois’ executive director to recap the case, board members didn’t
ask any questions about the dispute. That disappointed Ed Mullen, a
Democratic election law attorney who often advises candidates and
represents them in front of the board.
During the board’s public comment period at Tuesday’s meeting, Mullen
said that just the day before, a client asked him what is and isn’t
allowed when it comes to interacting with independent expenditure
committees.
“I just couldn't answer that question,” he said. “And I just encourage
you to look further into that and give us some more guidance.”
But board co-chair Laura Kent Donahue, a former GOP state senator who
spent 22 years in the legislature, told Mullen the board would likely
not intervene, and would leave it to the General Assembly.
“Sometimes it's a little dicey when you get to spelling it out,” she
said. “Because then you might leave something out and...it gets – it's
tricky. So I understand. We hear you, but it's gotta come from another
source and not necessarily from us.”
'Slated’ candidates still in limbo
Republican candidates for the General Assembly who didn’t run in the
March primary election are still a few weeks away from finding out
whether they’ll be allowed on the November ballot.
[to top of second column]
|
The Illinois State Board of Elections building is pictured in
Springfield. (Capitol News Illinois photo by Andrew Campbell)
Democrats who control the legislature hastily passed a measure last
month banning post-primary “slating,” a practice long used by both
parties in which local party officials appoint a candidate to run in a
general election after sitting out the primary. Party leaders will often
slate candidates to run in elections they deem winnable after seeing how
the primary shakes out.
But earlier this month, a Springfield-based judge blocked the Board of
Elections from enforcing the law during this election cycle against 14
candidates who signed onto a suit challenging the law, ruling it’s
unfair to change the rules midstream. House Speaker Emanuel “Chris”
Welch, D-Hillside, appealed that ruling to the Illinois Supreme Court
last week.
Meanwhile, the Board of Elections continued accepting nominating
petitions from slated candidates, with 15 Republicans filing to run for
legislative races by the June 3 deadline. Nearly all of those candidates
are facing challenges to their candidate paperwork – a common step in
running for office in Illinois in which opponents and their party allies
aim to disqualify nominating petitions by searching for possible forged
signatures or other technical errors.
Decisions in those cases will likely come at the board’s July 9 meeting;
a handful of slated Republican candidates showed up to meet with hearing
officers 22 floors below the conference room where Board of Elections
members in Chicago participated in Tuesday’s hearing.
That included Jay Keeven of Edwardsville, the slated challenger to
Democratic state Rep. Katie Stuart, also of Edwardsville. Keeven was the
only candidate to turn his nominating petitions before Pritzker signed
the slating bill into law.
But Keeven was not a party to the lawsuit, and Judge Gail Noll’s ruling
earlier this month specifically limited her injunction to the 14
candidates who sued over the law. The decision on Keeven’s petition
challenges is expected to address that issue.
Capitol News Illinois is
a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service covering state government. It is
distributed to hundreds of newspapers, radio and TV stations statewide.
It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert
R. McCormick Foundation, along with major contributions from the
Illinois Broadcasters Foundation and Southern Illinois Editorial
Association.
|