Legal group files complaint against three federal judges in Illinois
Send a link to a friend
[March 05, 2024]
By Catrina Petersen | The Center Square
(The Center Square) – Three federal judges in Illinois have standing
orders for their courtrooms allowing extra time for oral arguments only
for young lawyers who are either female or a member of a minority race.
A recent complaint against the practice alleges the orders are
unconstitutionally discriminatory.
America First Legal filed the complaint against three federal judges
from the Southern District of Illinois with the chief judge of the
Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.
"Those policies constitute judicial misconduct because they unlawfully
discriminate, evidence judicial bias, undermine faith in the judiciary’s
integrity, and violate the equal protection guarantee of the Fifth
Amendment," the complaint filed by Gene Hamilton of America First Legal
Foundation says. "I ask that you carefully consider the contents of this
complaint and, upon conclusion of your review, take appropriate
corrective action to ensure that no lawyer appearing before the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of Illinois faces
discrimination based on immutable characteristics."
William Trachman, general counsel for Mountain States Legal Foundation,
said in Colorado they have similar issues where judges are
discriminating based on race, so he’s paying attention to the complaint
in Illinois.
"It’s one thing to file a traditional complaint and hope that the judges
change their ways, or that the chief justice slaps them on the wrist.
It’s another thing to have their cases overturned or have their rulings
rejected because they offered a hearing to an African American attorney
that they wouldn’t have offered to a white person or an Asian person,”
Trachman said.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2024/Mar/05/images/ads/current/ldn_sda_NILA_010924.png)
Trachman said Illinois is more blatant with the discrimination because
the three Illinois judges have adopted orders that say that the court
will grant the request for oral argument for the minority or younger
female if it is practical to do so.
"The key is that the 'hearing will be granted,' well, a hearing is a big
benefit,” said Trachman. “You get to talk to the judge directly as
opposed to just on paper.”
Trachman said Mountain States has not filed an official complaint in
Colorado, but has submitted comments regarding the practice standards
that have the language about encouraging law firms to hire, retain and
send “diverse” attorneys to court. Trachman said the judges in Colorado
haven't defined what “diverse” means, but in Illinois he said it means
new, female and Black.
[to top of second column]
|
![](../images/030524PIX/news_e8.jpg)
The Southern District of Illinois federal district court in East St.
Louis - Greg Bishop / The Center Square
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2019/Sep/05/images/ads/current/stclara_lda_SPONSOR_090519.png)
"My engagement so far has been trying to figure a way to go beyond the
judicial complaints that have been filed and brainstorm a way how an
attorney or law firm could challenge these [practice standards],” said
Trachman. “For instance, say an Illinois attorney is denied a hearing in
the Illinois Southern District because he’s a white male, he could then
seek an appeal all the way up to the Supreme Court saying, ‘these
practice standards established violate the constitution.’ There ought to
be a way, at some point, for someone to have injury and the standing
necessary to challenge it and take it up higher."
Trachman said although in Illinois the judges have adopted orders, each
titled “Increasing Opportunities for Courtroom Advocacy,” in Colorado
the judges have adopted practice standards with the same intent.
“We [Mountain States] haven’t yet filed a complaint or sought some sort
of legal process like a lawsuit, but we are definitely paying close
attention to this. It’s not just happening in Illinois, but in other
places as well. Unfortunately it’s having a couple terrible effects. One
being to treat people differently based on their skin color and sex,”
said Trachman. “It’s the highest injustice, and to have it in the
context of a courtroom is surprising.”
U.S. Sens. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and John Kennedy, R-Louisiana, also wrote
a letter to the chief judge of the Seventh Circuit.
“In January 2020, Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel, along with Judge
Staci M. Yandle, and later in October 2020, Judge David W. Dugan, issued
nearly identical standing orders implementing a new policy regarding
oral arguments in an effort to ‘encourage the participation of newer,
female, and minority attorneys in proceedings’ in reaction to concerns
about ‘increasing opportunities for courtroom advocacy,'" the letter
said. "This policy is both unethical and unconstitutional."
Rosenstengel and Yandle were nominated by President Barack Obama. Dugan
was nominated by President Donald Trump. Trachman served in the U.S.
Department of Education as deputy assistant secretary in the Office for
Civil Rights after being appointed by Trump.
“Even the judiciary has to abide by the Constitution even if it’s their
own cases,” said Trachman. |