Hardline Republicans' hopes dashed as US Congress pushes funding bill
forward
Send a link to a friend
[March 22, 2024]
By David Morgan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Representative Chip Roy, one of the most
prominent hardline Republicans in Congress, pulls no punches when it
comes to how frustrated he is about the $1.2 trillion spending package
that lawmakers are working to pass before midnight on Friday.
"Everyone that I know and trust about the border, about overall
spending, see it as a complete and total failure and a capitulation by
Republicans. And (Republican) leadership worked the deal, so it's on
leadership," Roy told reporters.
"Republicans should reject it," added the Texas Republican, vowing that
he would not back the reelection campaigns of any fellow party member
who votes for it.
Roy is part of a small band of hardline Republicans in the House of
Representatives who spent the last 14 months in a bare-knuckle effort to
push Congress further to the right, railing against the
Democratic-majority Senate and many of their House Republican
colleagues.
Passage of the $1.2 trillion bill funding the government through Sept.
30, without any major hardline policy concessions, marks their defeat -
for now.
Soon after Republicans took narrow control of the House in January 2023,
party hardliners led by members of the House Freedom Caucus began
pushing to reset spending to pre-pandemic levels, stop the flow of
migrants across the U.S.-Mexico border and end diversity programs in
federal agencies, including the Pentagon.
Hardliners shuttered the House floor repeatedly and blocked Republican
spending bills they disliked. Ultimately, some of their number ousted
Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson's predecessor, Kevin McCarthy,
after he moved a bipartisan stop-gap bill to avert a government
shutdown.
But the bill on track to pass follows the broad outlines of a bipartisan
spending deal worked out between McCarthy and Democratic President Joe
Biden last May.
Hardliners also rejected a major bipartisan border bill that would have
imposed new limits on immigration, after Republican presidential
candidate Donald Trump voiced opposition to it.
House passage of the spending bill will likely provide another
illustration of how their tactics undercut their party's narrow 219-213
majority by forcing Johnson to turn to Democrats to approve the
legislation.
Did hardliners achieve any substantial successes during those months of
infighting and chaos?
"No," replied Representative Ken Buck, a hardline Republican who voted
for McCarthy's ouster. "The border is the same, which was the major
issue that people wanted policy changes on. And the spending levels are
absurd."
[to top of second column]
|
U.S. Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) speaks to reporters after a second round
of voting failed to elect a new Speaker of the House at the U.S.
Capitol in Washington, U.S., October 18, 2023. REUTERS/Elizabeth
Frantz/File Photo
Buck plans to leave Congress on Friday, before the end of his
two-year term, blaming a "breakdown in civility."
DIVIDED GOVERNMENT
House Republican leadership defended the bill as their best option
in a divided government, where Democrats hold a Senate majority as
well as the White House.
"Seventy percent of the bill is defense, including the largest pay
raise our troops have had in decades," House Majority Leader Steve
Scalise, the chamber's No. 2 Republican, said in response to
hardline criticism.
"At a time when the world is on fire more than ever, we need to make
sure that we're properly funding our nation's defense and supporting
our troops, who deserve that pay raise."
McCarthy's ouster by eight hardliners, including six Freedom Caucus
members, paralyzed the House for weeks in October until Republicans
settled on Johnson as a replacement.
In the end, the hardliners said that move hurt their cause.
"It really set us back, and these spending negotiations are
indicative of that," said Representative Byron Donalds, one of
roughly three dozen Freedom Caucus members. Like Roy, he voted
against McCarthy's ouster.
Their Democratic colleagues agreed.
"It clearly exposes the Republican caucus for being a very unstable
majority, if you can even call it a majority," said Democratic
Representative Gerry Connolly.
Hardliners insist their efforts have been fruitful, saying the
current bill keeps nondefense spending flat, targets unspent
COVID-19 funds, drains funds earmarked for the Internal Revenue
Service and ends taxpayer funding for the main U.N. relief agency
for Palestinians in Gaza, known as UNRWA.
What happens now as the fight over fiscal 2024 spending comes to an
end?
"Focus on 2025. We have to start trying to put the genie back in the
bottle," said Donalds.
(Reporting by David Morgan; Editing by Scott Malone and Jonathan
Oatis)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.]This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|