The inside story of Elon Musk’s mass firings of Tesla Supercharger staff
Send a link to a friend
[May 15, 2024] By
Chris Kirkham, Hyunjoo Jin and Abhirup Roy
(Reuters) - The day before Elon Musk fired virtually all of Tesla’s
electric-vehicle charging division last month, they had high hopes as
charging chief Rebecca Tinucci went to meet with Musk about the
network’s future, four former charging-network staffers told Reuters.
After Tinucci had cut between 15% and 20% of staffers two weeks earlier,
part of much wider layoffs, they believed Musk would affirm plans for a
massive charging-network expansion.
The meeting could not have gone worse. Musk, the employees said, was not
pleased with Tinucci’s presentation and wanted more layoffs. When she
balked, saying deeper cuts would undermine charging-business
fundamentals, he responded by firing her and her entire 500-member team.
The departures have upended a network widely viewed as a signature Tesla
achievement and a key driver of its EV sales. Tesla Superchargers
account for more than 60% of U.S. high-speed charging ports, federal
statistics show, and the company has been the biggest winner so far of
$5 billion in federal funding for new chargers.
This account, the most detailed to date on the Supercharger firings and
the fallout, is based on interviews with eight former charging-division
employees, one contractor and a Tesla email sent to outside vendors.
Only Musk and Tinucci were in the meeting described to Reuters; the four
sources with knowledge of the meeting are relaying what they heard about
it from Supercharger department managers.
Tesla, Musk and Tinucci did not respond to requests for comment from
Reuters.
Despite the mass firings, Musk has since posted on social media
promising to continue expanding the network. But three former
charging-team employees told Reuters they have been fielding calls from
vendors, contractors and electric utilities, some of which had spent
millions of dollars on equipment and infrastructure to help build out
Tesla’s network.

A letter sent earlier this month by a Tesla global-supply manager to
Supercharger contractors and suppliers instructed them to “please hold
on breaking ground on any newly awarded construction projects” and halt
materials purchases, according to a copy reviewed by Reuters. “I
understand that this period of change may be challenging, and that
patience is not easy when expecting to be paid!”
Tesla's energy team, which sells solar and battery-storage products for
homes and businesses, was tasked with taking over Superchargers and
calling some partners to close out ongoing charger-construction
projects, said three of the former Tesla employees.
One construction contractor said Tesla staffers contacting his company
since the layoffs “don’t know a thing.” The contractor said he had
expected Supercharger projects to provide about 20% of his 2024 revenue
but now plans to diversify to avoid relying on Tesla.

Tinucci was one of few high-ranking female Tesla executives. She
recently started reporting directly to Musk, following the departure of
battery-and-energy chief Drew Baglino, according to four former
Supercharger-team staffers. They said Baglino had historically overseen
the charging department without much involvement from Musk.
The charging-team layoffs mark the latest drama in a tumultuous year for
Tesla as Musk has shut down or delayed several core efforts meant to
drive the rapid EV sales growth that investors have expected. Instead,
Musk now says Tesla will shift its main focus to self-driving cars, a
fiercely competitive and riskier business that could take years to
develop.
The company posted its first decline in auto sales since 2020 in the
first quarter amid fierce competition from Chinese electric-vehicle
makers and sagging worldwide EV demand. Reuters reported in April that
Tesla had scrapped plans for a long-awaited affordable car known as the
Model 2. That has thrown into doubt Tesla’s plans for new factories in
Mexico and India, where Musk had been expected to travel last month to
meet Prime Minister Narendra Modi, before canceling at the last minute.
And a host of executives have departed amid deep companywide layoffs.
[to top of second column] |

Tesla electric vehicle chargers are seen during the winter in Hofn,
Iceland, February 16, 2022. REUTERS/Nacho Doce/File Photo

SCALED-BACK CHARGING EXPANSION
The energy team that was assigned to take over charging-network
management has some similar design and construction roles, two of
the former Tesla employees said. But charging projects are
fundamentally different because they are located in public places
and require extensive negotiations with utilities, local governments
and landowners, they said.
The energy team was already struggling to keep pace with its current
workload, said two of the former charging-network staffers. Yet when
the layoffs came down on April 30, Musk posted that the company
“still plans to grow the Supercharger network, just at a slower
pace.” On Friday, Musk posted that “Tesla will spend well over $500M
expanding our Supercharger network to create thousands of NEW
chargers this year.”
Two former Supercharger staffers called the $500 million expansion
budget a significant reduction from what the team had planned for
2024 - but nonetheless a challenge requiring hundreds of employees.
In an analysis provided to Reuters, San Francisco research firm
EVAdoption estimated a $500 million investment this year would
translate to Tesla building 77% fewer charging ports per month in
the United States compared with the automaker’s pace through April.
‘HOLDING THE BAG’
Tesla unveiled its first Supercharger stations throughout California
in 2012, with Musk calling the network a “game changer” for EVs that
would enable long-distance travel and convenience “equivalent to
gasoline cars.”
The EV-charging business requires substantial upfront investment,
and analysts have often viewed it as unprofitable. But Tesla’s
network had been profitable before the layoffs, according to four
former Tesla employees familiar with the division’s financial
performance.
That owed to Tesla’s cost-control and extensive analysis to choose
locations that could draw business throughout the day rather than
only during peak-demand times, when electricity costs spike. One
former Supercharger staffer said Tesla’s costs per-charging-port
were typically at least 50% lower than those of competitors.
As recently as last month, Tesla said in a securities filing that it
needed to expand charging to “ensure adequate availability” for
customers, particularly after automakers including Ford, General
Motors, Toyota and Hyundai announced they would start making their
cars compatible with Tesla’s charging plugs, giving their vehicles
Supercharger access.
Another former employee said that rollout is “completely
jeopardized” because there will not be enough new charging sites
coming online, and the company was only starting to implement
upgrades to allow more compatibility with other manufacturers’
vehicles.
Three of the former employees called the firings a major setback to
U.S. charging expansion because of the relationships Tesla employees
had built with suppliers and electric utilities. Tesla had grown
into one of the larger customers for many major utilities around the
country, and many had hired new staff and planned new infrastructure
based on Tesla’s charging-network expansion plans, the former
employees said.
Other companies may be able to fill the gap, the former employees
said, but the goodwill built over time with utilities and other
contractors from Tesla’s large-scale charging investments will be
difficult to replicate.
“It’s just unfortunate that now they’re stuck holding the bag on all
these different projects,” one of the former employees said. “It’s
really sad to see all these relationships burned and people be
really angry - rightfully so."
(Reporting by Chris Kirkham in Los Angeles, and Hyunjoo Jin and
Abhirup Roy in San Francisco; Edited by Brian Thevenot and Matthew
Lewis)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
 |