Americans divided as Supreme Court weighs abortion pill access, Reuters/Ipsos
poll finds
Send a link to a friend
[May 17, 2024]
By Gabriella Borter and Jason Lange
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Americans are divided on whether women should
have to see a doctor in person before receiving abortion pills, a new
Reuters/Ipsos poll found, as the U.S. Supreme Court weighs whether to
reimpose that restriction on medication abortion.
But broad bipartisan majorities opposed the idea of allowing states with
abortion bans in place to block access to the procedure in certain
emergency cases when it is needed to protect the mother's health, at
issue in another case before the court.
The findings come as the court is preparing to rule on its
highest-profile abortion cases since 2022, when the justices overturned
the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that established the national right to
abortion.
Some 50% of respondents in the May 7-14 survey said they supported an
in-person doctor visit requirement for abortion medication, while 33%
said they opposed that rule. Seventeen percent said they were unsure.
Around 67% of Republican respondents and 37% of Democrats said they were
in favor of the in-person dispensing requirement for mifepristone.
The court, with a 6-3 conservative majority, is expected to rule by late
June in a case challenging the accessibility of mifepristone, a drug
that is half of a two-part medication regimen to induce abortion in
early pregnancies.
The case before the court, which was brought by anti-abortion groups and
doctors, challenges the Food and Drug Administration allowing for
medication abortions up to 10 weeks of pregnancy instead of seven, and
for mail delivery of the drug without a patient first seeing a clinician
in-person. During March arguments, the justices appeared skeptical that
the groups that brought the case had the needed legal standing to pursue
it.
While respondents were divided on whether to tighten abortion pill
regulations, broad majorities opposed the idea behind Idaho's challenge
to a federal law known as the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act,
or EMTALA, that requires states to allow patients to access abortion in
emergency cases.
[to top of second column]
|
A patient prepares to take Mifepristone, the first pill in a medical
abortion, at Alamo Women's Clinic in Carbondale, Illinois, U.S.,
April 9, 2024. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo
Some 77% of respondents, including 86% of Democrats and 77% of
Republicans, said they supported requiring states with strict
abortion bans to permit abortion if necessary to protect the health
of a pregnant patient facing a medical emergency. The Court's
decision in that case is also expected by late June.
Majorities of both parties also opposed the idea of state
governments tracking pregnancies to allow them to take action if the
pregnancies are terminated in violation of state law. Republican
presidential candidate Donald Trump recently told Time magazine he
would not stop states from monitoring pregnancies.
Since the court's 2022 decision to overturn Roe, 16 states have
banned abortion in all or most cases and medication abortion has
become the most common method of ending pregnancies, now accounting
for more than 60% of U.S. abortions.
Overall, the share of Americans who support abortion rights has
grown over the last decade. Some 57% of respondents in the latest
Reuters/Ipsos poll said abortion should be legal in all or most
cases, up from 46% in Reuters/Ipsos polls conducted in 2014. Some
31% of respondents in the latest poll said it should be illegal in
most or all cases, down from 43% in 2014 polls. About one in 10
respondents consistently say they aren't sure.
The latest poll gathered responses from 3,934 U.S. adults nationwide
in an online survey conducted May 7-14. It had a margin of error of
about 2 percentage points for all respondents and about 3 points for
Republicans and Democrats.
(Reporting by Gabriella Borter and Jason Lange; Editing by Scott
Malone and Deepa Babington)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.]This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|